Sign PDF Using JavaScript and WebCrypto API
The evolution of WebCrypto API and its support in major browsers like Chrome and Firefox has raised the possibility of leveraging it for digital PDF signing. However, the lack of documentation and granular examples poses challenges. While examples exist explaining the signing process, the desired outcome – a signed Base64 PDF string – remains elusive.
Can we sign a PDF using JavaScript and WebCrypto API alone?
Currently, WebCrypto API lacks access to key stores or external cryptographic devices. To accommodate common PDF signing requirements, where the PDF should be protected within server boundaries, sending the entire document to the browser or signing API server is discouraged.
Optimal Approach
An effective solution involves creating a hash of the PDF for signing, sending that hash to the browser, and utilizing JavaScript through a browser extension to access a local keystore (or USB/Smartcard) to generate the signature. The resulting signature (e.g., PKCS7 or CMS container) can be sent back to the server, where it can be injected into the original PDF from which the hash was created.
Signer.Digital Extension for Browser Extensions
To facilitate browser-based signing scenarios, a browser extension called Signer.Digital and an accompanying .NET library are available. The extension works seamlessly with major browsers (Chrome and Firefox), leveraging the Signer.Digital Browser Host to interact with Windows Certificate stores and underlying CSPs to sign hashes.
JavaScript Code Sample
To invoke the signing function from the extension, JavaScript code can be used as follows:
// Calculate Sign for the Hash by Calling function from Extension SignerDigital SignerDigital.signPdfHash(hash, $("#CertThumbPrint").val(), "SHA-256") // or "SHA256" // SignerDigitial.signHashCAdESBr method may be used for producing ICP-Brazil Signature .then( function (signDataResp) { // Send signDataResp to Server }, function (errmsg) { // Send errmsg to server or display the result in browser. } );
Diagram: Digital Signing from Browser
[Image of Digital Signing from Browser]
- Server sends hash of the document to the browser.
- Browser uses the Signer.Digital Browser Extension JavaScript API to invoke an action from the extension host.
- The browser extension host interacts with the certificate store or crypto device to obtain the signed hash.
- The signature is returned to the browser by the extension host.
- The browser sends the signature back to the server, which can then incorporate it into the PDF.
The above is the detailed content of Can JavaScript and WebCrypto API Alone Sign a PDF?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment