It All Started With a Bug
Working with URLs in JavaScript and Node.js should be straightforward, but a recent bug in our project led me down a rabbit hole of subtle quirks in the URL and URLSearchParams APIs. This post will explore these quirks, how they can cause problems in your code, and what you can do to avoid them.
The Problem: URL Handling with Axios
We encountered this issue while generating URLs and adding hash signatures to them. The query parameters weren’t consistently percent-encoded, leading to unexpected behavior and wrong hash signatures.
It became clear that the interaction between URL and URLSearchParams objects required extra care.
Pitfall #1: URL.search vs. URLSearchParams.toString()
The first surprise was the difference between URL.search and URLSearchParams.toString().
Use care when using .searchParams to modify the URL because, per the WHATWG specification, the URLSearchParams object uses different rules to determine which characters to percent-encode. For instance, the URL object will not percent-encode the ASCII tilde (~) character, while URLSearchParams will always encode it.
// Example 1 const url = new URL("https://example.com?param=foo bar"); console.log(url.search); // prints param=foo%20bar console.log(url.searchParams.toString()); // prints ?param=foo+bar // Example 2 const myURL = new URL('https://example.org/abc?foo=~bar'); console.log(myURL.search); // prints ?foo=~bar // Modify the URL via searchParams... myURL.searchParams.sort(); console.log(myURL.search); // prints ?foo=%7Ebar
In our project, we needed to explicitly reassign url.search = url.searchParams.toString() to ensure the query string was encoded consistently.
Pitfall #2: The Plus Sign Dilemma
Another gotcha is how URLSearchParams handles characters. By default, URLSearchParams interprets as a space, which may lead to data corruption when encoding binary data or Base64 strings.
const params = new URLSearchParams("bin=E+AXQB+A"); console.log(params.get("bin")); // "E AXQB A"
One solution is to use encodeURIComponent before appending values to URLSearchParams:
params.append("bin", encodeURIComponent("E+AXQB+A"));
More details are available in the MDN documentation.
Pitfall #3: URLSearchParams.get vs. URLSearchParams.toString()
Another subtlety arises when comparing the outputs of URLSearchParams.get and URLSearchParams.toString. For example:
const params = new URLSearchParams("?key=value&key=other"); console.log(params.get("key")); // "value" (first occurrence) console.log(params.toString()); // "key=value&key=other" (all occurrences serialized)
In multi-valued scenarios, get returns only the first value, while toString serializes all.
The Fix in Our Codebase
In our project, we resolved the issue by explicitly reassigning the search property:
url.search = url.searchParams.toString(); url.searchParams.set( "hash", cryptography.createSha256HmacBase64UrlSafe(url.href, SECRET_KEY ?? "") );
This ensured that all query parameters were properly encoded before adding the hash value.
Node.js querystring module
The WHATWG URLSearchParams interface and the querystring module have a similar purpose, but the purpose of the querystring module is more general, as it allows the customization of delimiter characters (& and =). On the other hand, URLSearchParams API is designed purely for URL query strings.
querystring is more performant than URLSearchParams but is not a standardized API. Use URLSearchParams when performance is not critical or when compatibility with browser code is desirable.
When using URLSearchParams unlike querystring module, duplicate keys in the form of array values are not allowed. Arrays are stringified using array.toString(), which simply joins all array elements with commas.
// Example 1 const url = new URL("https://example.com?param=foo bar"); console.log(url.search); // prints param=foo%20bar console.log(url.searchParams.toString()); // prints ?param=foo+bar // Example 2 const myURL = new URL('https://example.org/abc?foo=~bar'); console.log(myURL.search); // prints ?foo=~bar // Modify the URL via searchParams... myURL.searchParams.sort(); console.log(myURL.search); // prints ?foo=%7Ebar
With querystring module, the query string 'foo=bar&abc=xyz&abc=123' is parsed into:
const params = new URLSearchParams("bin=E+AXQB+A"); console.log(params.get("bin")); // "E AXQB A"
Takeaways
Be cautious of how URLSearchParams handles special characters (e.g. ~) and spaces. Use encodeURIComponent when necessary.
Understand the difference between URL.search, URLSearchParams.get, and URLSearchParams.toString to avoid unexpected behavior.
In Node.js use querystring module if you want to parse duplicate query parameter keys as an array.
The above is the detailed content of Pitfalls of URL and URLSearchParams in JavaScript. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
