Home >Backend Development >Golang >Why Doesn\'t `fmt.Println` Call `String()` Methods on Struct Members in Go?
Unveiling the Inner Workings: Why fmt.Println Bypasses String() Methods for Structs
An intriguing observation has surfaced regarding fmt.Println's functionality when called upon a struct object. While one might anticipate the String() method being invoked for each member, this is not the case. Examining this discrepancy will shed light on the underlying reasons behind this behavior.
The Root Cause
To understand why fmt.Println skips String() methods for struct members, it is essential to consider two crucial factors:
A Path to Resolution
To rectify this issue and enable fmt.Println to utilize String() methods for struct members, several modifications are necessary:
By implementing these changes, fmt.Println will gain access to both the String() method and the exported fields, enabling it to produce the desired output:
package main import ( "fmt" ) type Bar struct { } func (b Bar) String() string { return "bar" } type Foo struct { B []Bar BB Bar } func main() { f := Foo{B: []Bar{Bar{}}, BB: Bar{}} fmt.Println(f) }
Output:
{[bar] bar} [bar] bar
Conclusion
Comprehension of the export status and field accessibility limitations within Go elucidates why fmt.Println does not inherently utilize String() methods for struct members. By addressing these issues through proper export conventions, the desired behavior can be achieved, fostering clarity and consistency in code.
The above is the detailed content of Why Doesn\'t `fmt.Println` Call `String()` Methods on Struct Members in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!