Home > Article > Backend Development > const Fred& or Fred const&: Which Placement Is Preferred in C ?
In C , there's a choice between placing the const reference specifier (const Fred&) before or after the type-specifier (Fred const&). Though they appear identical semantically, the placement can have stylistic implications.
Syntactically, const Fred& and Fred const& represent the same type: a constant reference to a Fred object. The compiler interprets them interchangeably, thus eliminating any semantic differences.
However, while semantically indifferent, there's a preference split when it comes to style. Some programmers favor placing the const before the type-specifier (const Fred&), citing its alignment with the C Programming Language book and the C standard. Others advocate for the post type-specifier placement (Fred const&), drawing inspiration from the style used in The C Programming Language by K&R and the C standard.
The right-to-left parsing rule often influences style choices. However, it's worth noting that const Fred& can also be parsed meaningfully from right to left: a reference to a constant Fred object. Moreover, Fred const* can introduce ambiguity if interpreted as "pointer constant to T" instead of "pointer to constant T."
Ultimately, the choice between const Fred& and Fred const& boils down to personal preference. However, considering the established conventions in the C and C communities, const Fred& seems to have a slight edge in popularity.
The above is the detailed content of const Fred& or Fred const&: Which Placement Is Preferred in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!