Why Use `` in Java Generics, Especially in `assertThat` Methods?

Java Generics: When and Why to Use ?

When using Java generics, there may be instances where you require instead of . This article examines the reasons behind this and explores any potential drawbacks associated with using .

Compilation Error in AssertThat Method

Consider the following code snippet:

Map<String, Class<? extends Serializable>> expected = null;
Map<String, Class<java.util.Date>> result = null;
assertThat(result, is(expected));

This code fails to compile due to a type mismatch. specifies that the actual parameter can be SomeClass or any of its subtypes. In this case, result holds Class objects, while expected can hold Class objects representing any class that implements Serializable. Thus, T is set specifically to Map>, which does not match Map>>`.

Changing to Matcher

Modifying the assertThat method signature to:

public static <T> void assertThat(T result, Matcher<? extends T> matcher)

resolves the compilation error. This allows the method to accept a Matcher that fits the result type, ensuring type safety.

Any Downsides of Using Matcher?

Using Matcher offers no significant drawbacks. It ensures that a compatible Matcher is provided, preventing potential runtime exceptions caused by mismatched types.

Purpose of assertThat Generics

Generics in the assertThat method allow for type checking to ensure that the provided Matcher corresponds to the result type. While the Matcher class does not require generics, using them helps enforce type safety and prevent potential errors.

The above is the detailed content of Why Use `` in Java Generics, Especially in `assertThat` Methods?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!