Waiting vs. Returning Promises: Understanding await vs. promise Returns
Introduction:
In JavaScript, handling asynchronous tasks can be achieved using promises. When dealing with promises in async functions, a common dilemma arises: should you use return await promise or simply return promise? This article explores the differences between these two approaches, highlighting their behavioral nuances and error-handling implications.
Behavior and Performance:
In general, there is no significant difference in observable behavior between using return await promise and return promise. Both approaches yield the same promise result and have negligible performance variations. However, the implementation may slightly favor the return await version due to the potential creation of an intermediate Promise object.
Error Handling:
The key difference emerges when return or return await is used within a try-catch block. Let's consider the code snippet:
async function rejectionWithReturnAwait () { try { return await Promise.reject(new Error()) } catch (e) { return 'Saved!' } } async function rejectionWithReturn () { try { return Promise.reject(new Error()) } catch (e) { return 'Saved!' } }
In rejectionWithReturnAwait, the async function awaits the rejected promise before returning its result. This triggers an exception, which is caught by the catch clause, leading the function to return a promise that resolves to "Saved!".
In contrast, rejectionWithReturn returns the rejected promise directly without awaiting it within the async function. Consequently, the catch case is not invoked, and the promise rejection is propagated to the caller.
Conclusion:
In most cases, both return await promise and return promise yield the same behavior. However, when error handling is involved within try-catch blocks, return await promise ensures the promise is awaited and exceptions are caught by the enclosing function, while return promise directly returns the promise without error handling within the function.
The above is the detailed content of Await vs. Promise Return: Which Should You Use in Error Handling?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft