Which Endless Loop Syntax in C/C is Best: for(;;), while(1), or while(true)?

Endless Loop in C/C

Question:

Various methods exist for creating an endless loop in C/C , including for(;;), while(1), and do {} while(1). Is there a preferred form, and do modern compilers optimize one over the others?

Answer:

While personal preferences drive many discussions on this topic, objective analysis reveals the following:

for(;;)

• Canonical form, cited in the authoritative "The C Programming Language" by Kernighan and Ritchie.
• Obscure due to the C standard's unique treatment of omitted elements in the for loop syntax.

while(1)

• More readable than for(;;), but relies on C's interpretation of non-zero expressions as true.
• May trigger compiler warnings ("condition is always true").

while(true)

• Intended to improve readability over while(1).
• Still triggers the same compiler warnings.
• Requires the use of the stdbool.h header and bool type, which may not be supported on all platforms.

Modern Compiler Optimization

Modern compilers recognize all these loop forms as infinite loops and perform equivalent optimizations. They may issue warnings depending on compiler settings, but the optimized code generated is the same.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice of endless loop syntax is a matter of personal preference. However, given the wide recognition of for(;;), its avoidance of compiler warnings, and the redundancy of additional readability efforts for those familiar with C/C , it remains a reasonable choice.

The above is the detailed content of Which Endless Loop Syntax in C/C is Best: for(;;), while(1), or while(true)?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!