search
HomeBackend DevelopmentC++Why Do 'Pure Virtual Function Call' Errors Happen in Constructors and Destructors?

Why Do

Unveiling the Enigma of "Pure Virtual Function Call" Crashes

In the realm of programming, encountering crashes伴随着 "pure virtual function call" errors can be perplexing, leaving developers scratching their heads. This article aims to shed light on the root causes behind these elusive errors.

The Abstract Nature of Pure Virtual Functions

Pure virtual functions are a fundamental aspect of object-oriented programming, enabling the declaration of functions in abstract classes that must be implemented in derived classes. By design, pure virtual functions have no implementation in the abstract class.

The Culprit: Constructor and Destructor Calls

However, the trouble arises when a virtual function call is attempted from within a constructor or destructor. In such cases, an inherent limitation comes into play: virtual function calls during object initialization or destruction are disallowed. The reason behind this restriction lies in the incomplete state of the derived class object during these phases of its existence.

Base Class Invocations

As a consequence of this prohibition, a virtual function call from a constructor or destructor results in the invocation of the base class version of the function. This presents a problem if the pure virtual function has no base class implementation, which is often the case in abstract classes.

An Illustrative Example

To illustrate the issue, consider the following C code:

class Base {
public:
    Base() { reallyDoIt(); }
    void reallyDoIt() { doIt(); } // DON'T DO THIS
    virtual void doIt() = 0;
};

class Derived : public Base {
    void doIt() {}
};

int main() {
    Derived d; // Triggers "pure virtual function call" error
}

In this example, the reallyDoIt() function in the Base class calls the doIt() function. However, since doIt() is a pure virtual function, the base class has no implementation for it. Consequently, when the Derived class object is created, it attempts to call the doIt() function from the constructor, leading to the dreaded "pure virtual function call" error.

Additional Resources

For a deeper dive into this topic, please refer to the insightful articles by Raymond Chen on the subject:

  • [Raymond Chen's Blog: "Pure Virtual Functions and the Vptr" (Part 1)](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/2007/12/18/pure-virtual-functions-and-the-vptr/)
  • [Raymond Chen's Blog: "Pure Virtual Functions and the Vptr" (Part 2)](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/2007/12/20/pure-virtual-functions-and-the-vptr-part-deux/)

The above is the detailed content of Why Do 'Pure Virtual Function Call' Errors Happen in Constructors and Destructors?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
C# vs. C  : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsC# vs. C : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsApr 19, 2025 am 12:07 AM

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

C# vs. C  : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceC# vs. C : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceApr 18, 2025 am 12:13 AM

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

C# vs. C  : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesC# vs. C : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesApr 17, 2025 am 12:02 AM

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

From XML to C  : Data Transformation and ManipulationFrom XML to C : Data Transformation and ManipulationApr 16, 2025 am 12:08 AM

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# vs. C  : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionC# vs. C : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionApr 15, 2025 am 12:16 AM

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.

Beyond the Hype: Assessing the Relevance of C   TodayBeyond the Hype: Assessing the Relevance of C TodayApr 14, 2025 am 12:01 AM

C still has important relevance in modern programming. 1) High performance and direct hardware operation capabilities make it the first choice in the fields of game development, embedded systems and high-performance computing. 2) Rich programming paradigms and modern features such as smart pointers and template programming enhance its flexibility and efficiency. Although the learning curve is steep, its powerful capabilities make it still important in today's programming ecosystem.

The C   Community: Resources, Support, and DevelopmentThe C Community: Resources, Support, and DevelopmentApr 13, 2025 am 12:01 AM

C Learners and developers can get resources and support from StackOverflow, Reddit's r/cpp community, Coursera and edX courses, open source projects on GitHub, professional consulting services, and CppCon. 1. StackOverflow provides answers to technical questions; 2. Reddit's r/cpp community shares the latest news; 3. Coursera and edX provide formal C courses; 4. Open source projects on GitHub such as LLVM and Boost improve skills; 5. Professional consulting services such as JetBrains and Perforce provide technical support; 6. CppCon and other conferences help careers

C# vs. C  : Where Each Language ExcelsC# vs. C : Where Each Language ExcelsApr 12, 2025 am 12:08 AM

C# is suitable for projects that require high development efficiency and cross-platform support, while C is suitable for applications that require high performance and underlying control. 1) C# simplifies development, provides garbage collection and rich class libraries, suitable for enterprise-level applications. 2)C allows direct memory operation, suitable for game development and high-performance computing.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download

Atom editor mac version download

The most popular open source editor

SublimeText3 Linux new version

SublimeText3 Linux new version

SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

SublimeText3 English version

SublimeText3 English version

Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.