Home >Backend Development >Golang >Which is faster in Go: `append()` or slice assignment?

Which is faster in Go: `append()` or slice assignment?

DDD
DDDOriginal
2024-11-11 01:49:02796browse

Which is faster in Go: `append()` or slice assignment?

Performance Comparison of Slice Append and Assignment in Go

In Go, slicing plays a significant role in managing data efficiently. However, questions arise regarding the performance differences between two commonly used slice operations: append and assignment.

Append vs. Assign

The append() operation extends the existing slice with additional elements, while the assignment operator (=), when applied to slices, simply overwrites the existing elements with new values.

Performance Analysis

Benchmarking the following code demonstrates the performance gap:

Benchmark results indicate that "a[i] = i" (assignment) consistently outperforms "a = append(a, i)" (append):

Explanation

The faster performance of "a[i] = i" can be attributed to its direct assignment nature. It simply assigns the value i to the corresponding element in the slice.

In contrast, "a = append(a, i)" involves a series of operations:

  1. Copy the existing slice header.
  2. Create a temporary slice for variadic parameters (i).
  3. Reslice a if there's sufficient capacity (provided in the benchmark).
  4. Assign i to the last element of a.
  5. Update the slice header in a local variable (a).

These extra steps introduce overhead compared to the direct assignment in "a[i] = i".

Conclusion

Understanding the performance differences between slice operations is crucial for optimizing code efficiency. For simple value assignment, "a[i] = i" proves to be a more efficient choice. However, when expanding the slice is necessary, "a = append(a, i)" remains the appropriate approach.

The above is the detailed content of Which is faster in Go: `append()` or slice assignment?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn