@Resource vs @Autowired: When to Use Which for Dependency Injection?

@Resource vs @Autowired: A Conceptual Understanding

When it comes to dependency injection in Java, developers often face the choice between @Resource and @Autowired annotations. Both annotations can effectively inject dependencies, but there exists a subtle difference in their semantics.

The @Resource annotation, part of the JSR-250 specification, implies a request for a known resource by name. The name can be specified directly or inferred from the annotated setter or field name.

In contrast, @Autowired (or @Inject) emphasizes a type-based approach. It attempts to inject a suitable component based on its type rather than its name.

This conceptual distinction is important to note, as it directly influences the behavior of these annotations. @Resource relies on a resource name to locate a specific dependency, while @Autowired focuses on automatic wiring based on type compatibility.

The Spring framework, however, provides an implementation of @Resource that includes a fallback机制. If no resource with the specified name is found, it resorts to type-based dependency injection like @Autowired. While convenient, this fallback often leads to confusion as developers may mistakenly use @Resource for type-based wiring.

To avoid such ambiguity, it is recommended to use @Resource for scenarios where name-based dependency injection is explicitly desired, and @Autowired (or @Inject) for type-based autowiring.

The above is the detailed content of @Resource vs @Autowired: When to Use Which for Dependency Injection?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!