@Resource vs @Autowired: When Should You Use Which for Dependency Injection?

Understanding the Difference Between @Resource vs @Autowired for Dependency Injection

In the realm of Dependency Injection (DI), developers often grapple with the choice between two popular annotations: @Resource (jsr250) and @Autowired (Spring-specific). While both effectively inject dependencies, they differ in their underlying concepts.

Semantic Distinction

@Resource signifies a request for a known resource by name. It extracts the name either from the annotated setter/field or an explicit name parameter. Conversely, @Autowired (or @Inject) seeks to automatically wire in a suitable component based on its type. These distinct approaches reflect two different DI paradigms.

Spring's Fallback

However, the Spring implementation of @Resource introduces a fallback mechanism. If resolution by name fails, it defaults to type-based autowiring, similar to @Autowired. While this fallback enhances convenience, it can also lead to confusion. Developers who are unaware of the semantic difference may inadvertently use @Resource for type-based injection.

Recommendation

Both annotations work effectively for dependency injection. However, it's crucial to understand their conceptual differences. Choose @Resource when you need to access resources by a known name and prefer type-based autowiring with @Autowired (or @Inject). This distinction ensures clarity and prevents the fallback mechanism from interfering with your intentions.

The above is the detailed content of @Resource vs @Autowired: When Should You Use Which for Dependency Injection?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!