Determining CPU Architecture at Compile Time
Identifying CPU architecture is crucial for code optimization and hardware-specific operations. However, different compilers utilize varying preprocessor definitions for this purpose, such as "_M_X86" for MSVS and "__i386__" for GCC.
Is There a Standard Approach for Architecture Detection?
Regrettably, there is no standard way to determine CPU architecture during compilation. Compilers implement their own methods for representing this information.
Comprehensive List of Architecture Definitions
While a standardized list of definitions doesn't exist, there are several resources available to assist in identifying specific compiler-related definitions:
- Compiler Documentation: Refer to the specific compiler's documentation for information on supported preprocessor definitions.
- Online Resources: Websites like "Github.com" or "Stack Overflow" often provide insights into compiler-specific architecture definitions.
Comprehensive Code Example for Architecture Detection
The following code snippet offers a comprehensive method for determining CPU architecture during compilation, accounting for a wide range of architectures:
extern "C" { const char *getBuild() { //Get current architecture, detectx nearly every architecture. Coded by Freak #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(_M_X64) return "x86_64"; #elif defined(i386) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__i386) || defined(_M_IX86) return "x86_32"; #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_2__) return "ARM2"; #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_3__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_3M__) return "ARM3"; #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_4T__) || defined(__TARGET_ARM_4T) return "ARM4T"; #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_5_) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_5E_) return "ARM5" #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_6T2_) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_6T2_) return "ARM6T2"; #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_6__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_6J__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_6K__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_6Z__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_6ZK__) return "ARM6"; #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_7__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_7A__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_7R__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_7M__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_7S__) return "ARM7"; #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_7A__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_7R__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_7M__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_7S__) return "ARM7A"; #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_7R__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_7M__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_7S__) return "ARM7R"; #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_7M__) return "ARM7M"; #elif defined(__ARM_ARCH_7S__) return "ARM7S"; #elif defined(__aarch64__) || defined(_M_ARM64) return "ARM64"; #elif defined(mips) || defined(__mips__) || defined(__mips) return "MIPS"; #elif defined(__sh__) return "SUPERH"; #elif defined(__powerpc) || defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__) || defined(__POWERPC__) || defined(__ppc__) || defined(__PPC__) || defined(_ARCH_PPC) return "POWERPC"; #elif defined(__PPC64__) || defined(__ppc64__) || defined(_ARCH_PPC64) return "POWERPC64"; #elif defined(__sparc__) || defined(__sparc) return "SPARC"; #elif defined(__m68k__) return "M68K"; #else return "UNKNOWN"; #endif } }
The above is the detailed content of How Can I Detect CPU Architecture at Compile Time?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The DOM and SAX methods can be used to parse XML data in C. 1) DOM parsing loads XML into memory, suitable for small files, but may take up a lot of memory. 2) SAX parsing is event-driven and is suitable for large files, but cannot be accessed randomly. Choosing the right method and optimizing the code can improve efficiency.

C is widely used in the fields of game development, embedded systems, financial transactions and scientific computing, due to its high performance and flexibility. 1) In game development, C is used for efficient graphics rendering and real-time computing. 2) In embedded systems, C's memory management and hardware control capabilities make it the first choice. 3) In the field of financial transactions, C's high performance meets the needs of real-time computing. 4) In scientific computing, C's efficient algorithm implementation and data processing capabilities are fully reflected.

C is not dead, but has flourished in many key areas: 1) game development, 2) system programming, 3) high-performance computing, 4) browsers and network applications, C is still the mainstream choice, showing its strong vitality and application scenarios.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, memory management and performance: 1) C# syntax is modern, supports lambda and LINQ, and C retains C features and supports templates. 2) C# automatically manages memory, C needs to be managed manually. 3) C performance is better than C#, but C# performance is also being optimized.

You can use the TinyXML, Pugixml, or libxml2 libraries to process XML data in C. 1) Parse XML files: Use DOM or SAX methods, DOM is suitable for small files, and SAX is suitable for large files. 2) Generate XML file: convert the data structure into XML format and write to the file. Through these steps, XML data can be effectively managed and manipulated.

Working with XML data structures in C can use the TinyXML or pugixml library. 1) Use the pugixml library to parse and generate XML files. 2) Handle complex nested XML elements, such as book information. 3) Optimize XML processing code, and it is recommended to use efficient libraries and streaming parsing. Through these steps, XML data can be processed efficiently.

C still dominates performance optimization because its low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it indispensable in game development, financial transaction systems and embedded systems. Specifically, it is manifested as: 1) In game development, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it the preferred language for game engine development; 2) In financial transaction systems, C's performance advantages ensure extremely low latency and high throughput; 3) In embedded systems, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it very popular in resource-constrained environments.

The choice of C XML framework should be based on project requirements. 1) TinyXML is suitable for resource-constrained environments, 2) pugixml is suitable for high-performance requirements, 3) Xerces-C supports complex XMLSchema verification, and performance, ease of use and licenses must be considered when choosing.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)
