Home > Article > Backend Development > Why Does `std::function`'s Template Argument Lead to Ambiguity in Overload Resolution?
Ambiguity Residing in Std::Function's Template Argument Despite Defining Type
In this scenario, multiple overloads exist for function 'a', each accepting a distinct signature of std::function:
The ambiguity arises due to the fact that both function
template<class _Fx> function(_Fx _Func, typename _Not_integral<!...int>::_Type = 0);
Essentially, any object can be converted into a std::function, facilitating type erasure and enabling the handling of arbitrary objects as functions.
To further illustrate the problem, consider the following simplified example:
template<class Signature> class myfunc{ public: template<class Func> myfunc(Func a_func){ // ... } };
During overload resolution for 'a', if a viable overload cannot be identified, the compiler attempts to convert the arguments using either the parameter's constructor or the argument's conversion operator. In this case, the conversion occurs via the constructor of myfunc.
Since myfunc's constructor accepts anything, both function
Ultimately, this results in the compiler being unable to determine which overload of 'a' to invoke, leading to the ambiguity.
To resolve this issue, you have several options:
The above is the detailed content of Why Does `std::function`'s Template Argument Lead to Ambiguity in Overload Resolution?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!