Home >Backend Development >Golang >Why Does `reflect.ValueOf(&value).Elem()` Trigger a Panic When Using `FieldByName` on a Pointer?

Why Does `reflect.ValueOf(&value).Elem()` Trigger a Panic When Using `FieldByName` on a Pointer?

Mary-Kate Olsen
Mary-Kate OlsenOriginal
2024-11-05 15:18:021015browse

Why Does `reflect.ValueOf(&value).Elem()` Trigger a Panic When Using `FieldByName` on a Pointer?

Addressing Panic in Reflect.Value.FieldByName

The .FieldByName method of a reflected value can trigger a panic if the value is a pointer. To resolve this, it's crucial to understand the structure and type of the value.

Consider the provided code:

s := reflect.ValueOf(&&value).Elem()
metric := s.FieldByName(subval.Metric).Interface()

In this code, the value is a struct, and the ValueOf() function is used to obtain a reflected value of &value, which is a pointer to the struct. However, calling Elem() on this reflected value effectively dereferences the pointer.

Therefore, a correct approach would be to directly obtain a reflected value of value:

s := reflect.ValueOf(value).Elem()
metric := s.FieldByName(subval.Metric).Interface()

By skipping the unnecessary indirection, this code avoids creating an unnecessary pointer, leading to a successful execution without the panic.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does `reflect.ValueOf(&value).Elem()` Trigger a Panic When Using `FieldByName` on a Pointer?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn