


Why Do ab and wrk Show Such Different Performance Results for Go HTTP Servers?
Disparate Results in Performance Testing with ab and wrk for Go HTTP Servers
When determining the capacity of a Go HTTP server, it is essential to conduct performance tests. However, vast discrepancies in results between benchmarking tools like ab and wrk can be puzzling.
Discrepancy Analysis
- ab limitations: ab is a rudimentary tool that adheres to HTTP/1.0, lacking support for keep-alive connections.
- Concurrent connections: In your ab test, 1000 concurrent connections were used compared to wrk's 1 connection. This difference significantly influences request rate.
- Test duration: ab runs for 12 seconds while wrk operates for 5. This time disparity also affects the results.
- Server workload: The test code simply responds with a static message, which does not reflect real-world server operations that involve database calls or content rendering.
- Machine resources: The benchmarking tools compete with the server for resources, including open sockets and memory. This contention can distort results.
Considerations for Performance Assessment
- Use a reliable tool: wrk is generally considered more accurate and comprehensive than ab.
- Simulate realistic workloads: Develop benchmarks that mirror the actual server operations.
- Test under controlled conditions: Ensure that both benchmarking tools are running under similar hardware and network conditions.
- Interpret results with caution: Benchmarks can provide insights but are highly context-dependent. Consider the limitations of your test setup and the variability between tools.
Conclusion
Benchmarking can help gauge a server's performance, but it is crucial to use appropriate tools and consider possible discrepancies. By acknowledging the limitations of ab and understanding the factors that influence test results, developers can obtain more accurate estimates of their server's capacity.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do ab and wrk Show Such Different Performance Results for Go HTTP Servers?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent programming, while C is more suitable for projects that require extreme performance and underlying control. 1) Golang's concurrency model simplifies concurrency programming through goroutine and channel. 2) C's template programming provides generic code and performance optimization. 3) Golang's garbage collection is convenient but may affect performance. C's memory management is complex but the control is fine.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang excels in practical applications and is known for its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) Concurrent programming is implemented through Goroutines and Channels, 2) Flexible code is written using interfaces and polymorphisms, 3) Simplify network programming with net/http packages, 4) Build efficient concurrent crawlers, 5) Debugging and optimizing through tools and best practices.

The core features of Go include garbage collection, static linking and concurrency support. 1. The concurrency model of Go language realizes efficient concurrent programming through goroutine and channel. 2. Interfaces and polymorphisms are implemented through interface methods, so that different types can be processed in a unified manner. 3. The basic usage demonstrates the efficiency of function definition and call. 4. In advanced usage, slices provide powerful functions of dynamic resizing. 5. Common errors such as race conditions can be detected and resolved through getest-race. 6. Performance optimization Reuse objects through sync.Pool to reduce garbage collection pressure.

Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Confused about the sorting of SQL query results. In the process of learning SQL, you often encounter some confusing problems. Recently, the author is reading "MICK-SQL Basics"...

The relationship between technology stack convergence and technology selection In software development, the selection and management of technology stacks are a very critical issue. Recently, some readers have proposed...


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.