search
HomeBackend DevelopmentC++[KOSD] Change of FromQuery Model Binding from .NET o .NET8

[KOSD] Change of FromQuery Model Binding from .NET o .NET8

Recently, while migrating our project from .NET 6 to .NET 8, my teammate Jeremy Chan uncovered an undocumented change in model binding behaviour that seems to appear since .NET 7. This change is not clearly explained in the official .NET documentation, so it can be something developers easily overlook.

To illustrate the issue, let’s begin with a simple Web API project and explore a straightforward controller method that highlights the change.

[ApiController]
public class FooController
{
  [HttpGet()]
  public async void Get([FromQuery] string value = "Hello")
  {
    Console.WriteLine($"Value is {value}");

    return new JsonResult() { StatusCode = StatusCodes.Status200OK };
  }
}

Then we assume that we have nullable enabled in both .NET 6 and .NET 8 projects.

<project sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web">

    <propertygroup>
        <nullable>enable</nullable>
        ...
    </propertygroup>

    ...

</project>

Situation in .NET 6

In .NET 6, when we call the endpoint with /foo?value=, we shall receive the following error.

{
  "type": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.5.1",
  "title": "One or more validation errors occurred.",
  "status": 400,
  "traceId": "00-5bc66c755994b2bba7c9d2337c1e5bc4-e116fa61d942199b-00",
  "errors": {
    "value": [
      "The value field is required."
    ]
  }
}

However, if we change the method to be as follows, the error will not be there.

public async void Get([FromQuery] string? value)
{
    if (value is null)
        Console.WriteLine($"Value is null!!!");
    else
        Console.WriteLine($"Value is {value}");

    return new JsonResult() { StatusCode = StatusCodes.Status200OK };
}

The log when calling the endpoint with /foo?value= will then be “Value is null!!!”.

Hence, we can know that query string without value will be interpreted as being null. That is why there will be a validation error when value is not nullable.

Thus, we can say that, in order to make the endpoint work in .NET 6, we need to change it to be as follows to make the value optional. This will not mark value as a required field.

public async void Get([FromQuery] string? value = "Hello")

Now, if we call the endpoint with /foo?value=, we shall receive see the log “Value is Hello” printed.

Situation in .NET 8 (and .NET 7)

Then how about in .NET 8 with the same original setup, i.e. as shown below.

public async void Get([FromQuery] string value = "Hello")

In .NET 8, when we call the endpoint with /foo?value=, we shall see the log “Value is Hello” printed.

So, what is happening here?

In .NET 7, a new Interface IParsable was introduced. Thus, starting from the .NET 7, IParsable.TryParse API is used for binding controller action parameter values.

Initial research shows that, under the hood, .NET 7 onwards, the new model binding implementation is used and it causes this to happen.

References

  • [API Proposal]: String should implement IParsable;
  • Have bool and string implement ISpanParsable.

KOSD, or Kopi-O Siew Dai, is a type of Singapore coffee that I enjoy. It is basically a cup of coffee with a little bit of sugar. This series is meant to blog about technical knowledge that I gained while having a small cup of Kopi-O Siew Dai.

The above is the detailed content of [KOSD] Change of FromQuery Model Binding from .NET o .NET8. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Using XML in C  : A Guide to Libraries and ToolsUsing XML in C : A Guide to Libraries and ToolsMay 09, 2025 am 12:16 AM

XML is used in C because it provides a convenient way to structure data, especially in configuration files, data storage and network communications. 1) Select the appropriate library, such as TinyXML, pugixml, RapidXML, and decide according to project needs. 2) Understand two ways of XML parsing and generation: DOM is suitable for frequent access and modification, and SAX is suitable for large files or streaming data. 3) When optimizing performance, TinyXML is suitable for small files, pugixml performs well in memory and speed, and RapidXML is excellent in processing large files.

C# and C  : Exploring the Different ParadigmsC# and C : Exploring the Different ParadigmsMay 08, 2025 am 12:06 AM

The main differences between C# and C are memory management, polymorphism implementation and performance optimization. 1) C# uses a garbage collector to automatically manage memory, while C needs to be managed manually. 2) C# realizes polymorphism through interfaces and virtual methods, and C uses virtual functions and pure virtual functions. 3) The performance optimization of C# depends on structure and parallel programming, while C is implemented through inline functions and multithreading.

C   XML Parsing: Techniques and Best PracticesC XML Parsing: Techniques and Best PracticesMay 07, 2025 am 12:06 AM

The DOM and SAX methods can be used to parse XML data in C. 1) DOM parsing loads XML into memory, suitable for small files, but may take up a lot of memory. 2) SAX parsing is event-driven and is suitable for large files, but cannot be accessed randomly. Choosing the right method and optimizing the code can improve efficiency.

C   in Specific Domains: Exploring Its StrongholdsC in Specific Domains: Exploring Its StrongholdsMay 06, 2025 am 12:08 AM

C is widely used in the fields of game development, embedded systems, financial transactions and scientific computing, due to its high performance and flexibility. 1) In game development, C is used for efficient graphics rendering and real-time computing. 2) In embedded systems, C's memory management and hardware control capabilities make it the first choice. 3) In the field of financial transactions, C's high performance meets the needs of real-time computing. 4) In scientific computing, C's efficient algorithm implementation and data processing capabilities are fully reflected.

Debunking the Myths: Is C   Really a Dead Language?Debunking the Myths: Is C Really a Dead Language?May 05, 2025 am 12:11 AM

C is not dead, but has flourished in many key areas: 1) game development, 2) system programming, 3) high-performance computing, 4) browsers and network applications, C is still the mainstream choice, showing its strong vitality and application scenarios.

C# vs. C  : A Comparative Analysis of Programming LanguagesC# vs. C : A Comparative Analysis of Programming LanguagesMay 04, 2025 am 12:03 AM

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, memory management and performance: 1) C# syntax is modern, supports lambda and LINQ, and C retains C features and supports templates. 2) C# automatically manages memory, C needs to be managed manually. 3) C performance is better than C#, but C# performance is also being optimized.

Building XML Applications with C  : Practical ExamplesBuilding XML Applications with C : Practical ExamplesMay 03, 2025 am 12:16 AM

You can use the TinyXML, Pugixml, or libxml2 libraries to process XML data in C. 1) Parse XML files: Use DOM or SAX methods, DOM is suitable for small files, and SAX is suitable for large files. 2) Generate XML file: convert the data structure into XML format and write to the file. Through these steps, XML data can be effectively managed and manipulated.

XML in C  : Handling Complex Data StructuresXML in C : Handling Complex Data StructuresMay 02, 2025 am 12:04 AM

Working with XML data structures in C can use the TinyXML or pugixml library. 1) Use the pugixml library to parse and generate XML files. 2) Handle complex nested XML elements, such as book information. 3) Optimize XML processing code, and it is recommended to use efficient libraries and streaming parsing. Through these steps, XML data can be processed efficiently.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SecLists

SecLists

SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

mPDF

mPDF

mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),