Why Use ContextLoaderListener or DispatcherServlet?
Many Spring web applications employ both ContextLoaderListener and DispatcherServlet in their web.xml configurations. However, one may wonder why this dual approach is employed instead of relying solely on the DispatcherServlet.
Rationale for ContextLoaderListener and DispatcherServlet
Typically, the ContextLoaderListener is responsible for loading application-wide, non-web-specific configuration (e.g., database connections, service beans). In contrast, the DispatcherServlet handles web-related configurations (e.g., controllers, views). This separation results in two contexts: a parent context (loaded by ContextLoaderListener) and a child context (loaded by DispatcherServlet).
Benefits of Using Both
This architecture has historically been seen as beneficial for various reasons:
Alternative Approach: Dispense with ContextLoaderListener
While using both ContextLoaderListener and DispatcherServlet has its advantages, it is worth considering a simplified approach. By removing the ContextLoaderListener and loading all Spring configurations within the DispatcherServlet, one eliminates potential conflicts between the two contexts.
Is It a Good Idea to Remove ContextLoaderListener?
The decision of whether to dispense with ContextLoaderListener depends on your application's specific requirements. If your application does not require any of the benefits listed above, removing ContextLoaderListener can simplify the configuration and potentially alleviate context-related issues.
Caution: If you decide to remove ContextLoaderListener, ensure that any background tasks or JMS connections are properly configured with
The above is the detailed content of Should I Use ContextLoaderListener or Just Stick with DispatcherServlet?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!