Home > Article > Backend Development > How Can Reflection Streamline Unit Testing for Functions with Similar Signatures in Go?
Testing a Collection of Functions with Reflection in Go
Problem
Unit testing a set of functions with similar signatures and return values can become repetitive and cumbersome. Traditional approaches involve writing individual tests for each function, which can lead to code duplication. Reflection offers a solution to streamline this process.
Solution Using Reflection
To leverage reflection in your tests:
Example Code
<code class="go">var funcNames = []string{"Func1", "Func2", "Func3"} func TestFunc(t *testing.T) { stype := reflect.ValueOf(s) for _, fname := range funcNames { fmt.Println(fname) sfunc := stype.MethodByName(fname) ret := sfunc.Call([]reflect.Value{}) val := ret[0].Int() if val < 1 { t.Error(fname + " should return positive value") } if !ret[1].IsNil() { t.Error(fname + " shouldn't err") } } }</code>
Note: If an invalid function name is specified, the test will panic. To mitigate this:
<code class="go">for _, fname := range funcNames { defer func() { if x := recover(); x != nil { t.Error("TestFunc paniced for", fname, ": ", x) } }() fmt.Println(fname) }</code>
The above is the detailed content of How Can Reflection Streamline Unit Testing for Functions with Similar Signatures in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!