


The Mystery of Missing Records: Debugging a JSON-to-CSV Transformation in Go
During my work on building a utility for data transformation on one of my side projects, I needed to convert a JSON-formatted file into CSV format. I ran into a tricky issue that took nearly an hour to debug before identifying the root cause.
The process should have been simple, consisting of three main steps:
- Open the JSON file
- Parse that JSON file into a specific struct
- Write the data to a CSV file First, to give you an idea, the JSON is an array with 65,342 elements.
func JsonToCSV(data *SrcSheet) { // Create file name in a format like "email_241030172647.csv" (email_yymmddhhmmss.csv) fName := fileName() // Create file f, err := os.Create(fName) if err != nil { log.Println("Unable to create file", err) return } defer f.Close() // Closing to release resources w := csv.NewWriter(f) // Initializing CSV writer // Add header header := []string{"email", "provider", "added_on"} if err = w.Write(header); err != nil { log.Println("Unable to write header", err) return } count := 0 for domain, elm := range data.Email { if err := w.Write(newRecord(domain, elm)); err != nil { log.Println("Unable to add new record", domain, err) return } else { count++ } } log.Println("Number of records written =", count) } func newRecord(email string, e *SrcElements) []string { if e == nil { return nil } DBFormat := "2006-01-02 15:04:05.000" addedOn := time.Now().UTC().Format(DBFormat) r := []string{email, e.Provider, addedOn} return r }
The code is straightforward: create a new file with a specific name format, defer its closing, initialize the CSV writer, and start writing to the file. Super simple, right?
Steps 1 and 2 worked well, so omitted them. Let’s shift focus to step 3, where something unexpected happened: the CSV output contained only 65,032 records, meaning 310 records were missing.
To troubleshoot, I tried the code with just 7 JSON elements instead of 65,032. Surprisingly, nothing was written to the CSV file at all!
I double-checked for simple mistakes, like missing file closure, but everything looked fine. I then retried with the full 65,032 elements, hoping to get more clues. That’s when I noticed that not only were 310 records missing, but the last record was incomplete as well.
65030 adam@gmail.com, gmail, 2023-03-17 15:04:05.000 65031 jac@hotmail.com, hotmail, 2023-03-17 15:04:05.000 65032 nancy@xyz.com, hotmail, 2023-03-
This was progress—I could now narrow down the issue and focus on w.Write(newRecord(domain, elm)), specifically the w.Write(...) method. I checked the documentation and found the reason:
... Writes are buffered, so [Writer.Flush] must eventually be called to ensure that the record is written to the underlying io.Writer ...
I had forgotten to call w.Flush(). This made sense since, from a performance perspective, the CSV writer buffers writes instead of executing I/O operations every time w.Write() is called. By buffering data, it reduces the I/O load, and calling w.Flush() at the end ensures any remaining data in the buffer is written to the file.
Here’s the corrected code:
... f, err := os.Create(fName) if err != nil { log.Println("Unable to create file", err) return } defer f.Close() w := csv.NewWriter(f) defer w.Flush() // Add header header := []string{"email", "provider", "added_on"} ...
To confirm, I checked the bufio.go source code and found that the default buffer size is 4K. In the WriteRune(...) method, you’ll see that it calls Flush whenever the buffer reaches its limit.
That’s all! I hope you enjoyed reading. I tend to learn a lot from mistakes—whether mine or others’. Even if there’s no immediate fix, discovering a wrong approach helps me avoid similar pitfalls in the future. That’s why I wanted to share this experience!
The above is the detailed content of The Mystery of Missing Records: Debugging a JSON-to-CSV Transformation in Go. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main differences between Golang and Python are concurrency models, type systems, performance and execution speed. 1. Golang uses the CSP model, which is suitable for high concurrent tasks; Python relies on multi-threading and GIL, which is suitable for I/O-intensive tasks. 2. Golang is a static type, and Python is a dynamic type. 3. Golang compiled language execution speed is fast, and Python interpreted language development is fast.

Golang is usually slower than C, but Golang has more advantages in concurrent programming and development efficiency: 1) Golang's garbage collection and concurrency model makes it perform well in high concurrency scenarios; 2) C obtains higher performance through manual memory management and hardware optimization, but has higher development complexity.

Golang is widely used in cloud computing and DevOps, and its advantages lie in simplicity, efficiency and concurrent programming capabilities. 1) In cloud computing, Golang efficiently handles concurrent requests through goroutine and channel mechanisms. 2) In DevOps, Golang's fast compilation and cross-platform features make it the first choice for automation tools.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance efficiency. 1) Golang improves efficiency through goroutine and garbage collection, but may introduce pause time. 2) C realizes high performance through manual memory management and optimization, but developers need to deal with memory leaks and other issues. When choosing, you need to consider project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang is more suitable for high concurrency tasks, while Python has more advantages in flexibility. 1.Golang efficiently handles concurrency through goroutine and channel. 2. Python relies on threading and asyncio, which is affected by GIL, but provides multiple concurrency methods. The choice should be based on specific needs.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

ChooseGolangforhighperformanceandconcurrency,idealforbackendservicesandnetworkprogramming;selectPythonforrapiddevelopment,datascience,andmachinelearningduetoitsversatilityandextensivelibraries.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor