


Why Does Mutating Object Prototypes Lead to Performance Degradation in JavaScript?
Why Mutating the Prototype of an Object Is Detrimental to Performance
Background
The JavaScript language provides two methods for manipulating the prototype property of an object: the standard setPrototypeOf function and the non-standard __proto__ property. However, it is strongly discouraged to mutate the prototype of an object using either of these methods.
Performance Implications
According to the MDN documentation, mutating the prototype significantly slows down subsequent execution in modern JavaScript implementations. This is because the process involves changing the object's type, which invalidates previously optimized code and forces the interpreter to deoptimize. This deoptimization process can have a significant impact on performance.
Comparison of Mutating Methods
Both foo.__proto__.bar = bar and Foo.prototype.bar = bar create a bar property on the Object.getPrototypeOf(foo) object. However, setting the __proto__ property itself, as in fred.__proto__ = Object.prototype or Object.setPrototypeOf(fred, Object.prototype), is what triggers the performance degradation.
Underlying Reasons
Changing the prototype chain of an existing object disrupts the internal type optimizations employed by JavaScript engines. The engine must discard previously compiled code and fall back to non-optimized code, leading to a performance penalty.
Expert Opinions
Various experts have expressed concerns about mutable prototypes:
- Brendan Eich: "Writable proto is a giant pain to implement and creates type-confusion hazards."
- Brian Hackett: "Mutable proto makes it harder to reason about script behavior and complicates VM, JIT, and analysis implementation."
- Jeff Walden: "Prototype mutation after creation destabilizes performance and impacts proxies and [[SetInheritance]]."
Alternatives
Instead of mutating the prototype of an existing object, it is recommended to create new objects with a different prototype chain using Object.create(). This approach preserves optimizations and avoids the performance penalty associated with prototype mutation.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does Mutating Object Prototypes Lead to Performance Degradation in JavaScript?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.
