search
HomeJavajavaTutorialAre Java 8 Streams Really Slower Than Collections?

  Are Java 8 Streams Really Slower Than Collections?

Streams vs Collections Performance in Java 8

Initial Benchmark

A developer conducted an informal benchmark to assess the difference in performance between Java 8 Streams and legacy Collections for filtering and mathematical operations on a list of integers. The result showed that Streams were about twice as slow as Collections, and parallel processing did not yield significant improvements.

Updated Results

Following suggestions to use JMH for benchmarking and warm up the JVM, the test was repeated numerous times. Surprisingly, the updated results indicated that Streams outperformed Collections.

Possible Explanations

  • Choice of Data Structure: The use of LinkedList in the initial test may have negatively impacted performance. It is generally less efficient for random access and iterations compared to ArrayList for large lists.
  • Intent of Streams: Streams are designed primarily for ease of coding and safety, rather than maximizing speed. They offer the ability to express data transformations and operations in a concise and type-safe manner.
  • JIT Optimization: While JIT optimizations can inline functions from Streams, the resulting code may not be as efficient as carefully handcrafted manual implementations.

Benchmarking Cautions

Accurate benchmarking requires proper methodologies and tools. Avoid hand-written code and use libraries like JMH to ensure reliable results. Additionally, consider the context of your application and the specific operations you need to perform.

Conclusion

Streams offer a convenient and safe way to manipulate data, but they may not always be the fastest option. For performance-critical applications, manual implementations might be more suitable. However, Streams provide significant benefits in terms of code readability and maintainability, making them a valuable tool for developers.

The above is the detailed content of Are Java 8 Streams Really Slower Than Collections?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator

AI Hentai Generator

Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

R.E.P.O. Energy Crystals Explained and What They Do (Yellow Crystal)
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
R.E.P.O. Best Graphic Settings
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Will R.E.P.O. Have Crossplay?
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

SublimeText3 English version

SublimeText3 English version

Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

PhpStorm Mac version

PhpStorm Mac version

The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool