Home > Article > Backend Development > Why is Specifying Exception Types a Pythonic Best Practice?
Specified Exception Types: Pythonic Best Practice
PyCharm's warning that "except:" statements without exception types are "Too broad" is a valuable reminder of a fundamental principle in Pythonic programming:
Always specify an exception type in except statements.
Using a bare except: clause can have several consequences:
Instead, it's crucial to explicitly specify the exception types that you intend to handle. This enables the interpreter to directly jump to the appropriate exception handler, improving efficiency and reducing the risk of catching unintended exceptions.
Furthermore, catching specific exceptions facilitates more precise handling logic. For instance, if you need to handle both "row exists" and "server down" exceptions, you would catch them separately as follows:
<code class="python">try: insert(connection, data) except AlreadyExistsException: update(connection, data) except ServerException: log_error(ServerException) raise</code>
One exception to this rule is using except: at the top-level of a continuously running application, such as a network server. However, this should be used sparingly and accompanied by comprehensive logging to ensure proper error tracking.
In summary, specifying exception types is a Pythonic best practice that promotes clarity, efficiency, and precise exception handling. By adhering to this principle, you can write robust and maintainable code that can effectively address potential exceptions.
The above is the detailed content of Why is Specifying Exception Types a Pythonic Best Practice?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!