Home > Article > Backend Development > Why Does My Thread-Safe Queue Dequeue() Function Cause a Segmentation Fault When Empty?
C 11 Thread-Safe Queue: Understanding and Debugging
You're encountering a segmentation fault in your thread-safe queue implementation within the dequeue() function, specifically when the queue is empty. This anomaly arises because your wait condition, wait_for(lock, timeout) is not properly structured to handle spurious wake-ups.
Understanding Spurious Wake-ups
Condition variables like populatedNotifier can experience spurious wake-ups, where they are awakened without any actual notification occurring. This behavior is inherent in the underlying multithreading implementation and can be unpredictable.
Correcting the Condition
To avoid relying on potentially unreliable notifications, best practice dictates using the inverse of the desired condition as the basis for your while loop in dequeue() and similar functions: while (!condition). Within this loop:
Example Implementation
Here's a revised version of your dequeue() function:
<code class="cpp">std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lock(qMutex); while (q.empty()) { c.wait(lock); if (q.empty()) { // Immediately check the condition again after acquiring the lock return std::string(); } } std::string ret = q.front(); q.pop(); return ret;</code>
By following these guidelines, you can ensure that your wait condition is robust and not susceptible to spurious wake-ups, effectively resolving your segmentation fault issue.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does My Thread-Safe Queue Dequeue() Function Cause a Segmentation Fault When Empty?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!