


Why Do Floating-Point Arithmetic Results Differ Between x86 and x64 Builds in MS VS 2010?
Floating-Point Arithmetic Discrepancies Between x86 and x64 in MS VS 2010
In Microsoft Visual Studio 2010, floating-point arithmetic operations exhibit discrepancies between x86 and x64 builds, even when executed on the same 64-bit machine. This is evident in the following code snippet:
<code class="c++">float a = 50.0f; float b = 65.0f; float c = 1.3f; float d = a*c; bool bLarger1 = d <p>The boolean variable bLarger1 is consistently false, with d being set to 65.0 in both builds. However, bLarger2 is false for x64 but true for x86.</p> <p><strong>The Culprit: x87 vs. SSE</strong></p> <p>The discrepancy arises from the fact that the x86 build uses the x87 floating-point unit (FPU) while the x64 build uses the Streaming SIMD Extensions (SSE) unit. The difference lies in the precision of the calculations.</p> <p>The x87 FPU performs calculations in double precision by default, even when handling single-precision values. The SSE unit, on the other hand, performs calculations in pure single precision. As a result, x87 calculations are slightly more accurate than SSE calculations.</p> <p>In this case, the x87 FPU's increased precision leads to a rounding error that causes d to be slightly less than 65.0. This makes bLarger2 false for x86. In contrast, the SSE calculation in x64 produces a more precise value for d, resulting in a true value for bLarger2.</p> <p><strong>Workaround for x86</strong></p> <p>To force the x86 build to perform calculations in single precision, the following line can be added:</p> <pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false"><code class="c++">_controlfp(_PC_24, _MCW_PC);</code>
This sets the floating-point control word to perform all calculations in single precision. With this change, both bLarger1 and bLarger2 will be set to false for both x86 and x64 builds.
Conclusion
The discrepancy in floating-point arithmetic between x86 and x64 builds in MS VS 2010 stems from the difference between the x87 FPU and the SSE unit. The x87 FPU's higher precision leads to slightly different values compared to the SSE unit's true single-precision calculations. By forcing single-precision calculations on x86, developers can mitigate this issue and ensure consistent results across different platforms.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do Floating-Point Arithmetic Results Differ Between x86 and x64 Builds in MS VS 2010?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main differences between C# and C are memory management, polymorphism implementation and performance optimization. 1) C# uses a garbage collector to automatically manage memory, while C needs to be managed manually. 2) C# realizes polymorphism through interfaces and virtual methods, and C uses virtual functions and pure virtual functions. 3) The performance optimization of C# depends on structure and parallel programming, while C is implemented through inline functions and multithreading.

The DOM and SAX methods can be used to parse XML data in C. 1) DOM parsing loads XML into memory, suitable for small files, but may take up a lot of memory. 2) SAX parsing is event-driven and is suitable for large files, but cannot be accessed randomly. Choosing the right method and optimizing the code can improve efficiency.

C is widely used in the fields of game development, embedded systems, financial transactions and scientific computing, due to its high performance and flexibility. 1) In game development, C is used for efficient graphics rendering and real-time computing. 2) In embedded systems, C's memory management and hardware control capabilities make it the first choice. 3) In the field of financial transactions, C's high performance meets the needs of real-time computing. 4) In scientific computing, C's efficient algorithm implementation and data processing capabilities are fully reflected.

C is not dead, but has flourished in many key areas: 1) game development, 2) system programming, 3) high-performance computing, 4) browsers and network applications, C is still the mainstream choice, showing its strong vitality and application scenarios.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, memory management and performance: 1) C# syntax is modern, supports lambda and LINQ, and C retains C features and supports templates. 2) C# automatically manages memory, C needs to be managed manually. 3) C performance is better than C#, but C# performance is also being optimized.

You can use the TinyXML, Pugixml, or libxml2 libraries to process XML data in C. 1) Parse XML files: Use DOM or SAX methods, DOM is suitable for small files, and SAX is suitable for large files. 2) Generate XML file: convert the data structure into XML format and write to the file. Through these steps, XML data can be effectively managed and manipulated.

Working with XML data structures in C can use the TinyXML or pugixml library. 1) Use the pugixml library to parse and generate XML files. 2) Handle complex nested XML elements, such as book information. 3) Optimize XML processing code, and it is recommended to use efficient libraries and streaming parsing. Through these steps, XML data can be processed efficiently.

C still dominates performance optimization because its low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it indispensable in game development, financial transaction systems and embedded systems. Specifically, it is manifested as: 1) In game development, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it the preferred language for game engine development; 2) In financial transaction systems, C's performance advantages ensure extremely low latency and high throughput; 3) In embedded systems, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it very popular in resource-constrained environments.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools
