Home > Article > Web Front-end > Is Checking `some_variable` in an `if` Statement Equivalent to Checking for `undefined` and `null`?
In JavaScript, we often encounter the need to check if a variable is undefined or null. A common approach involves the following code pattern:
<code class="javascript">if (typeof(some_variable) != 'undefined' && some_variable != null) { // Do something with some_variable }</code>
However, this pattern can be verbose. To optimize this check, some developers propose simplifying the code to:
<code class="javascript">if (some_variable) { // Do something with some_variable }</code>
While this shorter version appears logical, it raises important questions about its equivalence to the original code.
The difference lies in the behavior of the second code pattern. If the some_variable is undefined, Firebug will throw an error when evaluating the condition. This means that the second pattern assumes the variable is declared, whereas the first pattern handles both declared and undeclared variables.
A more efficient and consistent way to check for null or undefined variables is:
<code class="javascript">if (some_variable == null) { // Do something with some_variable }</code>
This code snippet accurately identifies when the variable is either null or undefined, without requiring declaration or causing runtime errors in Firebug.
In modern browsers, the Nullish coalescing operator (??) and Logical nullish assignment (??=) provide concise ways to assign default values when a variable is null or undefined:
<code class="javascript">a.speed ??= 42; // Sets default speed to 42 if null or undefined</code>
The above is the detailed content of Is Checking `some_variable` in an `if` Statement Equivalent to Checking for `undefined` and `null`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!