Compile-Time String Length Computation: A Caveat for C Programmers
Determining the length of a string at compile time can be a valuable optimization for efficient string handling. In C , programmers may utilize the constexpr keyword to achieve this. However, a common misconception exists regarding the guaranteed evaluation of constexpr functions at compile time.
Consider the following code snippet:
<code class="cpp">#include <cstdio> int constexpr length(const char* str) { return *str ? 1 + length(str + 1) : 0; } int main() { printf("%d %d", length("abcd"), length("abcdefgh")); }</cstdio></code>
In this code, we define a constexpr function length that recursively computes the length of a C-style string. The assembly code generated shows that the results are calculated during compilation.
So, is compile-time evaluation of length guaranteed by the C standard?
No. While it is possible that many compilers will evaluate constexpr functions at compile time, the standard does not mandate it. According to the draft C standard section 5.19, constant expressions can be evaluated during translation (i.e., compile time), but this is merely a non-normative note.
To ensure compile-time evaluation, programmers can adopt two strategies:
- Require compile-time evaluation: Use constexpr in a context that necessitates constant expressions, such as array bounds or case labels.
- Initialize a constexpr variable: Assign the result of the constexpr function to a constexpr variable.
For example:
<code class="cpp">constexpr int len1 = length("abcd");</code>
Conclusion:
While constexpr functions offer the potential for compile-time computation, programmers should be aware of the limitations of their guaranteed evaluation. By adhering to the aforementioned strategies, developers can harness the power of constexpr to optimize string-handling tasks at compile time.
The above is the detailed content of Is Compile-Time Evaluation of `constexpr` Functions Guaranteed in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.

C still has important relevance in modern programming. 1) High performance and direct hardware operation capabilities make it the first choice in the fields of game development, embedded systems and high-performance computing. 2) Rich programming paradigms and modern features such as smart pointers and template programming enhance its flexibility and efficiency. Although the learning curve is steep, its powerful capabilities make it still important in today's programming ecosystem.

C Learners and developers can get resources and support from StackOverflow, Reddit's r/cpp community, Coursera and edX courses, open source projects on GitHub, professional consulting services, and CppCon. 1. StackOverflow provides answers to technical questions; 2. Reddit's r/cpp community shares the latest news; 3. Coursera and edX provide formal C courses; 4. Open source projects on GitHub such as LLVM and Boost improve skills; 5. Professional consulting services such as JetBrains and Perforce provide technical support; 6. CppCon and other conferences help careers

C# is suitable for projects that require high development efficiency and cross-platform support, while C is suitable for applications that require high performance and underlying control. 1) C# simplifies development, provides garbage collection and rich class libraries, suitable for enterprise-level applications. 2)C allows direct memory operation, suitable for game development and high-performance computing.

C Reasons for continuous use include its high performance, wide application and evolving characteristics. 1) High-efficiency performance: C performs excellently in system programming and high-performance computing by directly manipulating memory and hardware. 2) Widely used: shine in the fields of game development, embedded systems, etc. 3) Continuous evolution: Since its release in 1983, C has continued to add new features to maintain its competitiveness.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor