Why Does `std::sort` Not Always Call `std::swap` for Small Ranges?

std::sort Does Not Always Call std::swap

In certain cases, std::sort may not invoke the custom swap function defined for a given data type. This behavior has been observed in GCC's stdlibc implementation and is particularly apparent when working with small ranges of elements.

For performance efficiency, GCC's std::sort implementation employs insertion sort for ranges below a certain size. This is because insertion sort is faster than quicksort or introsort for small datasets. However, insertion sort does not utilize the defined swap function. Instead, it performs a direct move of the entire element range to achieve faster performance.

This behavior is illustrated in the code snippet below:

<code class="cpp">#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

namespace my_space
{

struct A
{
    double a;
    double* b;
    bool operatora  vec(n);
    for (int i = 0; i <p>When n is set to 20, the custom swap function is called, and the array is sorted correctly. However, if n is reduced to 4, the custom swap function is not invoked, but the array is vẫn được still correctly sorted.</p>
<p>This behavior can become problematic when working with expensive-to-copy objects. To mitigate this issue, consider using an implementation of std::sort that always calls the provided swap function. Additionally, you may want to report this behavior to the GCC developers for further optimization.</p></vector></iostream></algorithm></code>

The above is the detailed content of Why Does `std::sort` Not Always Call `std::swap` for Small Ranges?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!