Home  >  Article  >  Java  >  How do the Big-O complexities of different Java Collections Framework implementations impact performance and guide data structure selection?

How do the Big-O complexities of different Java Collections Framework implementations impact performance and guide data structure selection?

Patricia Arquette
Patricia ArquetteOriginal
2024-10-28 22:25:02418browse

How do the Big-O complexities of different Java Collections Framework implementations impact performance and guide data structure selection?

Big-O Notation for Java Collections Framework Implementations

Understanding the Big-O order of operations for various Java Collections Framework implementations is crucial when selecting the appropriate data structure for a specific task.

List Implementations

  • ArrayList: O(1) for get, add, contains, and iterator.remove; O(n) for remove(0)
  • LinkedList: O(n) for get, O(1) for add, contains, and remove(0), O(1) for iterator.remove
  • CopyOnWriteArrayList: O(1) for get, O(n) for add, contains, and remove(0), O(n) for iterator.remove

Set Implementations

  • HashSet: O(1) for add and contains, O(h/n) for next (where h is the table capacity)
  • LinkedHashSet: O(1) for all operations
  • CopyOnWriteArraySet: O(n) for add and contains, O(1) for next
  • EnumSet: O(1) for all operations
  • TreeSet: O(log n) for all operations
  • ConcurrentSkipListSet: O(log n) for all operations

Map Implementations

  • HashMap: O(1) for get and containsKey, O(h/n) for next (where h is the table capacity)
  • LinkedHashMap: O(1) for all operations
  • IdentityHashMap: O(1) for get and containsKey, O(h/n) for next (where h is the table capacity)
  • EnumMap: O(1) for all operations
  • TreeMap: O(log n) for all operations
  • ConcurrentHashMap: O(1) for get and containsKey, O(h/n) for next (where h is the table capacity)
  • ConcurrentSkipListMap: O(log n) for all operations

Queue Implementations

  • PriorityQueue: O(log n) for offer and poll, O(1) for peek and size
  • ConcurrentLinkedQueue: O(1) for all operations
  • ArrayBlockingQueue: O(1) for offer, peek, and poll, O(1) for size
  • LinkedBlockingQueue: O(1) for offer, peek, and poll, O(1) for size
  • PriorityBlockingQueue: O(log n) for offer and poll, O(1) for peek and size
  • DelayQueue: O(log n) for offer and poll, O(1) for peek and size
  • LinkedList: O(1) for all operations
  • ArrayDeque: O(1) for all operations
  • LinkedBlockingDeque: O(1) for all operations

Additional Resources

For a comprehensive summary table and annotated outline of all Java Collections Framework implementations, refer to the following resources:

  • Collections Overview: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/collections/intro/index.html
  • Annotated Outline: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/package-summary.html

The above is the detailed content of How do the Big-O complexities of different Java Collections Framework implementations impact performance and guide data structure selection?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn