TLDR;
Work with a legacy code base - many of us don't able to dodge time by time - lead me to try the jsDoc instead of Typescript. I have to reveal the surprising truth!
First off all let's clean: jsDoc or TS just means under developer time ( included later review, reusing, look at that code in any environment: git web page, random editor, chrome, firefox, ...:devtool, vim, cat ... );
The First Movement
Just open your editor, write a proper remark to test jsDoc is working or not.
/** @typedef { 'JS' | 'JQuery' | 'TS' | 'jsDoc' } Phase; */ /** * On typing ' editor will popup string list. * * @type {Phase} */ const badCase = 'React'; // !!!! lint alert !!!! /** @type {Phase} */ const goodCase = 'JQuery';
jsDoc vs. Typescript
In my experience the jsDoc able to replace the TS code, bonus the wormhole between these two exists.
The biggest jsDoc feature imho: this is using a standard JS comment system, so don't break any JS code, this code will rune everywhere where JS capable to run.
feature | jsDoc | Typescript |
---|---|---|
compiling freedom | Do not need compiling the code. | mandatory to compile |
dependency freedom | Can working without any dependency | at least TS is your dependency |
namespace freedom | Don't interfere Types and other imports names. You can use same name of component and component Type in React for example. | Typesript names are identical including as any other referenct |
rework freedom | Don't need to change existing code, just insert a comment. | at least some part in your code need to be turn to TS |
legacy freedom | Can be use even transform to Typescript the project is not option. Many legacy projects affected this situation. | need to push management to allow that modification |
Maximalism freedom | Don't need to use every where. Even you can use on a new commits, and after easy to search which is the new or reworked parts. | also enough to turn build system, and just part of code to TS |
future freedom | Later can easy trasnlate to TS. Under the hood this is use same technic, just different way. | need to work if decide to use JS instead TS |
mindset freedom | Because this is a comment your know well this is don't made any type check at runtime for you as TS also. | TS is noising your code |
jsDoc editors experience
I can write jsDoc in any editor, but rare which is understand it.
node module experience
I also created a npm module: jsdoc-duck: a jsDoc coded module. This highlighted that without TypeScript, it is not possible to create a jsDoc npm module. Maybe if I am speend more time to figure out vite building parameters then can be found a right solution. But the good news, if don't use that modul with npm, instead borrowing to our code: just copy index.js to a place - then we are save use to insert a new dependency to our program, and don't happen nothing if module owner turn the module to something else.
Wormhole between jsDoc Typescript
The good news the Typescript and jsDoc are compatible each other, just the jsDoc use a bit different syntax. But you can use jsDoc module types in a typescripts and you can also use typescript module types in javascript / js jsDoc program also. So the final decision is in your hand.
Follow the yellow brick road
VS code example show how nicely saw your Types in jsDoc code, in my opinion this is surprising fewer noise give to your code.
Bonus
:: VS-Code snippets
/** @typedef { 'JS' | 'JQuery' | 'TS' | 'jsDoc' } Phase; */ /** * On typing ' editor will popup string list. * * @type {Phase} */ const badCase = 'React'; // !!!! lint alert !!!! /** @type {Phase} */ const goodCase = 'JQuery';
:: jsdoc-duck code
( in this view syntax highlight don't help to understund the Types ). But this short program is good example the jsDoc can use TS advanced features also.
"@type": { "prefix": ["ty"], "body": ["/** @type {<pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">import { useMemo, useReducer } from "react"; /** * @template T - Payload Type * @typedef {T extends { type: infer U, payload?: infer P } ? { type: U, payload?: P } : never} ActionType */ /** @template AM - Actions Map @typedef {{ [K in AM['type']]: K }} Labels */ /** @template AM - Actions Map @typedef {{ [T in AM["type"]]: Extract<am type: t> extends { payload: infer P } ? (payload: P) => void : () => void }} Quack */ /** * @template ST - State * @template AM - Actions Map * @typedef {(state: ST, action: AM) => ST} Reducer */ /** * Factory function to create a typed action map. * @template AM - Actions Map * @param {Labels<am>} labelsObject - The keys representing action labels. * @param {function} dispatch - The dispatch function for actions. * @return {Quack<am>} The resulting typed action map. */ export const quackFactory = (labelsObject, dispatch) => Object .keys(labelsObject) .reduce( /** * @arg {Quack<am>} acc * @arg {keyof Labels<am>} type * @return {Quack<am>} */ (acc, type) => ({ ...acc, [type]: (payload) => {dispatch({ type, payload });} }), {}); /** * A factory hook to create a state and a typed dispatch functions\ * @exports useDuck * @template AM - Actions Map * @template ST - State Typer * @param {(st: ST, action: AM) => ST} reducer - The reducer function to manage the state. * @param {ST} initialState - The initial state value. * @return {[ST, Quack<am>]} The current state and a map of action dispatch functions. */ export const useDuck = (reducer, initialState, labels) => { const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(reducer, initialState); const quack = useMemo( () => quackFactory(labels, dispatch), [dispatch, labels] ); return ([state, quack]); }; </am></am></am></am></am></am></am>} */"], "description": "jsdoc type" }, "@typedef": { "prefix": ["td"], "body": ["/** @typedef {} Foo */"], "description": "jsdoc typedef" },
happy coding, burrowing instead add dependency
The above is the detailed content of jsDoc Evangelism. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
