Home  >  Article  >  Backend Development  >  Here are a few title options, each highlighting a different aspect of the article: Focusing on the problem: * How to Set Fields in Different Firebase Message Structs with Generics in Go 1.18? * Gene

Here are a few title options, each highlighting a different aspect of the article: Focusing on the problem: * How to Set Fields in Different Firebase Message Structs with Generics in Go 1.18? * Gene

Linda Hamilton
Linda HamiltonOriginal
2024-10-27 20:32:01720browse

Here are a few title options, each highlighting a different aspect of the article:

Focusing on the problem:

* How to Set Fields in Different Firebase Message Structs with Generics in Go 1.18?
* Generic Function for Struct Members from External Packages:

Generic Function for Struct Members from External Packages

Consider the goal of creating a single function for adding specific fields to different Firebase message structs, like Message and MulticastMessage, which share common fields of similar types. Initially, an attempt to define a generic function highPriority using a type constraint as follows yielded an error:

<code class="go">type firebaseMessage interface {
    *messaging.Message | *messaging.MulticastMessage
}

func highPriority[T firebaseMessage](message T) T {
    message.Android = &amp;messaging.AndroidConfig{...}
    return message
}</code>

Limitations of Go 1.18

In Go 1.18, accessing common fields or methods of type parameters is not supported. Therefore, this approach fails.

Solution 1: Type Switch

For a limited number of types in the union, a type switch can be utilized:

<code class="go">func highPriority[T firebaseMessage](message T) T {
    switch m := any(message).(type) {
    case *messaging.Message:
        setConfig(m.Android)
    case *messaging.MulticastMessage:
        setConfig(m.Android)
    }
    return message
}</code>

Solution 2: Wrapper with Method

Another approach involves defining a wrapper type that implements a common method to set the desired config:

<code class="go">type wrappedMessage interface {
    *MessageWrapper | *MultiCastMessageWrapper
    SetConfig(c foo.Config)
}

// ...

func highPriority[T wrappedMessage](message T) T {
    message.SetConfig(messaging.Android{"some-value"})
    return message
}</code>

Solution 3: Reflection

For scenarios with numerous structs, reflection can be employed:

<code class="go">func highPriority[T firebaseMessage](message T) T {
    cfg := &amp;messaging.Android{}
    reflect.ValueOf(message).Elem().FieldByName("Android").Set(reflect.ValueOf(cfg))
    return message
}</code>

Additional Notes:

  • For more information on type parameter limitations, refer to [How can I define a struct field in my interface as a type constraint?](https://go.dev/play/p/9iG0eSep6Qo).
  • For details on implementing common methods for types in a union constraint, visit [In Go generics, how to use a common method for types in a union constraint?](https://go.dev/play/p/JUHp9Fu27Yt).

The above is the detailed content of Here are a few title options, each highlighting a different aspect of the article: Focusing on the problem: * How to Set Fields in Different Firebase Message Structs with Generics in Go 1.18? * Gene. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn