Home > Article > Backend Development > Why Do User-Defined Constructors Eliminate Default Constructors in C#, C , and Java?
Understanding the Absence of Default Constructors When Overridden
In programming languages like C#, C , and Java, declaring a constructor with parameters triggers the disappearance of the default parameterless constructor. While this behavior is generally accepted as a convention, it raises questions about the underlying reasoning.
Technical Reasons vs. Intended Functionality
Contrary to popular belief, the compiler has no technical limitations preventing the creation of a default constructor alongside user-defined constructors. However, the absence of the default constructor serves a practical purpose.
Enforcing Intended Usage
Promoting Explicit Control
Preserving Developer Freedom
Conclusion
The disappearance of the default parameterless constructor when user-defined constructors are introduced is not a limitation but rather a deliberate design choice aimed at promoting logical consistency, enforcing intended usage, and providing developers with flexibility in object creation.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do User-Defined Constructors Eliminate Default Constructors in C#, C , and Java?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!