


Go time comparison
You are trying to compare two time instances, but the result is not what you expect.
You have two functions GenerateWIB and GenerateUTC to change the time zone of a given time. GenerateUTC works perfectly, while GenerateWIB doesn't.
The code to compare the two times is:
<code class="go">expect := time.Date(2016, 12, 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, wib) t1 := time.Date(2016, 12, 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, time.UTC) res := GenerateWIB(t1) if res != expect { fmt.Printf("WIB Expect %+v, but get %+v", expect, res) }</code>
The result of this comparison is always false, even though the two times are the same.
The problem is that you are using the == operator to compare two time.Time instances. The == operator compares the values of all the fields of the two structs, including the Location field.
The Location field specifies the time zone of the time instance. In your case, expect has a time zone of wib, while res has a time zone of UTC. This is why the == operator returns false.
To compare two time.Time instances correctly, you should use the Equal method. The Equal method compares the values of the wall and ext fields of the two structs, which represent the time instant. The Equal method ignores the Location field.
Here is the corrected code:
<code class="go">expect := time.Date(2016, 12, 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, wib) t1 := time.Date(2016, 12, 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, time.UTC) res := GenerateWIB(t1) if !res.Equal(expect) { fmt.Printf("WIB Expect %+v, but get %+v", expect, res) }</code>
Now, the result of the comparison is true, which is the correct result.
Note
The Equal method is more accurate than the == operator when comparing two time.Time instances. The Equal method considers only the time instant, while the == operator also considers the time zone.
In general, you should use the Equal method to compare two time.Time instances, unless you have a specific reason to use the == operator.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does Comparing Time.Time Instances Using the == Operator Return False Even If They Represent the Same Time?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang excels in practical applications and is known for its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) Concurrent programming is implemented through Goroutines and Channels, 2) Flexible code is written using interfaces and polymorphisms, 3) Simplify network programming with net/http packages, 4) Build efficient concurrent crawlers, 5) Debugging and optimizing through tools and best practices.

The core features of Go include garbage collection, static linking and concurrency support. 1. The concurrency model of Go language realizes efficient concurrent programming through goroutine and channel. 2. Interfaces and polymorphisms are implemented through interface methods, so that different types can be processed in a unified manner. 3. The basic usage demonstrates the efficiency of function definition and call. 4. In advanced usage, slices provide powerful functions of dynamic resizing. 5. Common errors such as race conditions can be detected and resolved through getest-race. 6. Performance optimization Reuse objects through sync.Pool to reduce garbage collection pressure.

Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Confused about the sorting of SQL query results. In the process of learning SQL, you often encounter some confusing problems. Recently, the author is reading "MICK-SQL Basics"...

The relationship between technology stack convergence and technology selection In software development, the selection and management of technology stacks are a very critical issue. Recently, some readers have proposed...

Golang ...


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software