What Are the Differences Between C and Java Generics?

Comparing "Generic" Types in C and Java

Java and C both incorporate mechanisms for handling generic types. While these features share similarities, there are distinct differences between them.

Key Distinction: Type Specification

In C , generic types do not require specifying a class or interface. This flexibility allows for the creation of truly generic functions and classes with looser typing. For example, the following C function can add objects of any type with the " " operator:

<code class="cpp">template <typename t> T sum(T a, T b) { return a + b; }</typename></code>

In Java, on the other hand, generic types require specifying a type to invoke methods on passed objects. This restriction ensures type safety but limits their flexibility:

<code class="java"><t extends something> T sum(T a, T b) { return a.add ( b ); }</t></code>

Code Generation and Optimization

In C , generic functions and classes are defined in headers, as the compiler generates different functions for different types. This process incurs a performance overhead during compilation.

In Java, the compilation is less affected by generics, as it employs a technique called "erasure" at runtime. This means that generic types are effectively removed, resulting in the following call:

<code class="java">Something sum(Something a, Something b) { return a.add ( b ); }</code>

Implications

The choice between C and Java generics depends on specific requirements.

• C generics offer greater flexibility and the ability to create truly generic algorithms, but they require stricter adherence to the template programming model.
• Java generics provide type safety while making it easier to invoke methods on passed objects, but they limit the level of genericity.

The above is the detailed content of What Are the Differences Between C and Java Generics?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!