The Cost of RTTI
While it's widely acknowledged that Runtime Type Information (RTTI) carries a performance cost, it's often difficult to find specific measurements or quantitative data. This becomes even more crucial when considering embedded systems with limited resources.
RTTI Performance Impact
The implementation of RTTI is compiler-dependent, leading to varying performance overhead. However, certain general observations can be made:
- GCC's preferred ABI: If your target platform uses the "vendor-neutral" C ABI preferred by GCC, RTTI support has a negligible space overhead as it leverages existing vtables. Additionally, typeid(a) == typeid(b) comparisons are exceptionally fast.
- Other platforms: For platforms not using the preferred ABI, RTTI support may incur additional runtime overhead.
Avoiding RTTI
For design reasons, it's recommended to avoid using RTTI whenever possible. However, there are instances when its use is necessary. In such cases, it's important to assess the resource implications carefully.
Quantitative Benchmarks
Despite claims that RTTI is expensive, reliable benchmarks are hard to come by. One study suggests that the memory overhead for RTTI is minimal, while the processor time overhead is implementation-specific.
Static vs. Dynamic Casting
To reduce runtime costs, consider leveraging static casting whenever possible:
<code class="cpp">if (typeid(a) == typeid(b)) { B* ba = static_cast<b>(&a); }</b></code>
This eliminates the need for inheritance traversal and unnecessary comparisons.
Ultimately, the cost-effectiveness of RTTI depends on the specific implementation and the constraints of your system. However, by understanding the underlying mechanisms and adopting appropriate coding practices, you can minimize the runtime impact of RTTI in embedded systems.
The above is the detailed content of What is the Runtime Cost of RTTI in Embedded Systems?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

XML is used in C because it provides a convenient way to structure data, especially in configuration files, data storage and network communications. 1) Select the appropriate library, such as TinyXML, pugixml, RapidXML, and decide according to project needs. 2) Understand two ways of XML parsing and generation: DOM is suitable for frequent access and modification, and SAX is suitable for large files or streaming data. 3) When optimizing performance, TinyXML is suitable for small files, pugixml performs well in memory and speed, and RapidXML is excellent in processing large files.

The main differences between C# and C are memory management, polymorphism implementation and performance optimization. 1) C# uses a garbage collector to automatically manage memory, while C needs to be managed manually. 2) C# realizes polymorphism through interfaces and virtual methods, and C uses virtual functions and pure virtual functions. 3) The performance optimization of C# depends on structure and parallel programming, while C is implemented through inline functions and multithreading.

The DOM and SAX methods can be used to parse XML data in C. 1) DOM parsing loads XML into memory, suitable for small files, but may take up a lot of memory. 2) SAX parsing is event-driven and is suitable for large files, but cannot be accessed randomly. Choosing the right method and optimizing the code can improve efficiency.

C is widely used in the fields of game development, embedded systems, financial transactions and scientific computing, due to its high performance and flexibility. 1) In game development, C is used for efficient graphics rendering and real-time computing. 2) In embedded systems, C's memory management and hardware control capabilities make it the first choice. 3) In the field of financial transactions, C's high performance meets the needs of real-time computing. 4) In scientific computing, C's efficient algorithm implementation and data processing capabilities are fully reflected.

C is not dead, but has flourished in many key areas: 1) game development, 2) system programming, 3) high-performance computing, 4) browsers and network applications, C is still the mainstream choice, showing its strong vitality and application scenarios.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, memory management and performance: 1) C# syntax is modern, supports lambda and LINQ, and C retains C features and supports templates. 2) C# automatically manages memory, C needs to be managed manually. 3) C performance is better than C#, but C# performance is also being optimized.

You can use the TinyXML, Pugixml, or libxml2 libraries to process XML data in C. 1) Parse XML files: Use DOM or SAX methods, DOM is suitable for small files, and SAX is suitable for large files. 2) Generate XML file: convert the data structure into XML format and write to the file. Through these steps, XML data can be effectively managed and manipulated.

Working with XML data structures in C can use the TinyXML or pugixml library. 1) Use the pugixml library to parse and generate XML files. 2) Handle complex nested XML elements, such as book information. 3) Optimize XML processing code, and it is recommended to use efficient libraries and streaming parsing. Through these steps, XML data can be processed efficiently.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software
