Does Chaining STL Methods in C Preserve Evaluation Order?
In Bjarne Stroustrup's "The C Programming Language" 4th edition, the following code snippet exemplifies method chaining:
<code class="cpp">void f2() { std::string s = "but I have heard it works even if you don't believe in it"; s.replace(0, 4, "").replace(s.find("even"), 4, "only").replace(s.find(" don't"), 6, ""); assert(s == "I have heard it works only if you believe in it"); }</code>
This code evaluates statements from left to right, altering the string s incrementally. However, the behavior of this expression is ambiguous depending on the compiler used:
- Clang: Evaluation follows the expected order, resulting in s as "I have heard it works only if you believe in it".
- GCC: The evaluation order is unpredictable, causing s to take on an incorrect value.
- Visual Studio: Similar to GCC, the evaluation is ambiguous, often producing the same incorrect result.
Unveiling the Unspecified Behavior
The code exhibits unspecified behavior because of the indeterminate order of evaluation of subexpressions, despite not invoking undefined behavior. The crux of the issue lies in the evaluation order of function arguments within chained function calls.
Specifically, for the following sub-expressions:
- s.find("even")
- s.find(" don't")
Their evaluation order is indeterminate with respect to:
- s.replace(0, 4, "")
This means that the find calls can be evaluated before or after the replace call, affecting the length of s and consequently altering the results of the find calls.
Illustration with Custom Find Function
To demonstrate this ambiguity, a modified version of the code uses a custom my_find function that reports the position of the search strings in each sub-expression evaluation:
<code class="cpp">std::string::size_type my_find(std::string s, const char *cs) { std::string::size_type pos = s.find(cs); std::cout <p>Running this code with different compilers yields different results depending on the evaluation order:</p> <ul> <li> <strong>Clang:</strong> my_find is evaluated for "even" before it is evaluated for "don't," resulting in the correct output.</li> <li> <strong>GCC:</strong> my_find is evaluated for "don't" before it is evaluated for "even," leading to an incorrect result.</li> </ul> <p><strong>C 17 Changes</strong></p> <p>The C 17 standard (p0145r3) introduces refinements to the expression evaluation order rules to address this ambiguity. It strengthens the order of evaluation for postfix-expressions and their expression-list as follows:</p> <ul><li><strong>The postfix-expression is sequenced before each expression in the expression-list and any default argument.</strong></li></ul> <p>This ensures that chained method calls evaluate in the expected order, resolving this undefined behavior in C 17.</p></code>
The above is the detailed content of Does STL Method Chaining Preserve Evaluation Order in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.

C still has important relevance in modern programming. 1) High performance and direct hardware operation capabilities make it the first choice in the fields of game development, embedded systems and high-performance computing. 2) Rich programming paradigms and modern features such as smart pointers and template programming enhance its flexibility and efficiency. Although the learning curve is steep, its powerful capabilities make it still important in today's programming ecosystem.

C Learners and developers can get resources and support from StackOverflow, Reddit's r/cpp community, Coursera and edX courses, open source projects on GitHub, professional consulting services, and CppCon. 1. StackOverflow provides answers to technical questions; 2. Reddit's r/cpp community shares the latest news; 3. Coursera and edX provide formal C courses; 4. Open source projects on GitHub such as LLVM and Boost improve skills; 5. Professional consulting services such as JetBrains and Perforce provide technical support; 6. CppCon and other conferences help careers

C# is suitable for projects that require high development efficiency and cross-platform support, while C is suitable for applications that require high performance and underlying control. 1) C# simplifies development, provides garbage collection and rich class libraries, suitable for enterprise-level applications. 2)C allows direct memory operation, suitable for game development and high-performance computing.

C Reasons for continuous use include its high performance, wide application and evolving characteristics. 1) High-efficiency performance: C performs excellently in system programming and high-performance computing by directly manipulating memory and hardware. 2) Widely used: shine in the fields of game development, embedded systems, etc. 3) Continuous evolution: Since its release in 1983, C has continued to add new features to maintain its competitiveness.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor