


Why is forEach Function Not Working in Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge?
forEach Function Not Working in Recent Microsoft Browsers
In an attempt to create a script for product choices in a web application, a developer encountered an error in Internet Explorer 11 and Microsoft Edge. The error message indicated that the forEach function was not supported, despite the function being reportedly available in IE9 and newer versions.
Exploring the Issue
The forEach method is commonly used to iterate over array elements and apply a function to each element. In this case, the developer utilized the method for selecting color options from a product's configuration. However, upon investigation, it was found that the following code snippet:
var color_btns = document.querySelectorAll('#color > p'); color_btns.forEach(function(color) { color.onclick = function () { color_btns.forEach(function(element) { if (element.classList.contains('selected')) { element.classList.remove('selected'); } }); color.classList.add('selected'); document.querySelector('#f_color').value = color.dataset.id; }; });
was not functioning as expected in Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge, throwing an error indicating that the forEach function was not a property of the NodeList returned by querySelectorAll.
Reason for the Issue
After further research, it was discovered that NodeList and HTMLCollection, the types of objects returned by querySelectorAll and similar methods, are not true arrays but rather iterables. In JavaScript, iterables are objects that can be iterated over using for-of loops, spread operators, or destructuring assignments.
NodeList objects have recently gained support for the forEach method, but HTMLCollection objects do not and are not expected to support it. This is due to backward compatibility concerns, as adding the forEach method to HTMLCollection could potentially break existing code.
Polyfilling forEach
To resolve the issue, it is recommended to polyfill the forEach method for NodeList objects. Polyfilling involves adding a method to an object that is not natively supported. The following code snippet can polyfill forEach for NodeList:
if (typeof NodeList !== "undefined" && NodeList.prototype && !NodeList.prototype.forEach) { NodeList.prototype.forEach = Array.prototype.forEach; }
Direct assignment, as shown in the code above, is possible because enumerable, configurable, and writable should all be true, and it's a value property.
Polyfilling Iterability
Additionally, NodeList objects can also be made iterable to support iterating over them using for-of loops and spread operators. This can be achieved with the following polyfill:
if (typeof Symbol !== "undefined" && Symbol.iterator && typeof NodeList !== "undefined" && NodeList.prototype && !NodeList.prototype[Symbol.iterator]) { Object.defineProperty(NodeList.prototype, Symbol.iterator, { value: Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator], writable: true, configurable: true }); }
Example Using Polyfills
By incorporating these polyfills, the original code can be modified to run seamlessly in all supported browsers:
// Polyfilling forEach for NodeList if (typeof NodeList !== "undefined" && NodeList.prototype && !NodeList.prototype.forEach) { NodeList.prototype.forEach = Array.prototype.forEach; } // Polyfilling iterability for NodeList if (typeof Symbol !== "undefined" && Symbol.iterator && typeof NodeList !== "undefined" && NodeList.prototype && !NodeList.prototype[Symbol.iterator]) { Object.defineProperty(NodeList.prototype, Symbol.iterator, { value: Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator], writable: true, configurable: true }); } var color_btns = document.querySelectorAll('#color > p'); color_btns.forEach(function(color) { color.onclick = function () { color_btns.forEach(function(element) { if (element.classList.contains('selected')) { element.classList.remove('selected'); } }); color.classList.add('selected'); document.querySelector('#f_color').value = color.dataset.id; }; });
This updated code snippet should function as intended in all browsers, including Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge.
The above is the detailed content of Why is forEach Function Not Working in Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The differences in performance and efficiency between Python and JavaScript are mainly reflected in: 1) As an interpreted language, Python runs slowly but has high development efficiency and is suitable for rapid prototype development; 2) JavaScript is limited to single thread in the browser, but multi-threading and asynchronous I/O can be used to improve performance in Node.js, and both have advantages in actual projects.

JavaScript originated in 1995 and was created by Brandon Ike, and realized the language into C. 1.C language provides high performance and system-level programming capabilities for JavaScript. 2. JavaScript's memory management and performance optimization rely on C language. 3. The cross-platform feature of C language helps JavaScript run efficiently on different operating systems.

JavaScript runs in browsers and Node.js environments and relies on the JavaScript engine to parse and execute code. 1) Generate abstract syntax tree (AST) in the parsing stage; 2) convert AST into bytecode or machine code in the compilation stage; 3) execute the compiled code in the execution stage.

The future trends of Python and JavaScript include: 1. Python will consolidate its position in the fields of scientific computing and AI, 2. JavaScript will promote the development of web technology, 3. Cross-platform development will become a hot topic, and 4. Performance optimization will be the focus. Both will continue to expand application scenarios in their respective fields and make more breakthroughs in performance.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

Yes, the engine core of JavaScript is written in C. 1) The C language provides efficient performance and underlying control, which is suitable for the development of JavaScript engine. 2) Taking the V8 engine as an example, its core is written in C, combining the efficiency and object-oriented characteristics of C. 3) The working principle of the JavaScript engine includes parsing, compiling and execution, and the C language plays a key role in these processes.

JavaScript is at the heart of modern websites because it enhances the interactivity and dynamicity of web pages. 1) It allows to change content without refreshing the page, 2) manipulate web pages through DOMAPI, 3) support complex interactive effects such as animation and drag-and-drop, 4) optimize performance and best practices to improve user experience.

C and JavaScript achieve interoperability through WebAssembly. 1) C code is compiled into WebAssembly module and introduced into JavaScript environment to enhance computing power. 2) In game development, C handles physics engines and graphics rendering, and JavaScript is responsible for game logic and user interface.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function
