Portuguese version
Axios and Fetch are popular tools for making HTTP requests in JavaScript, but they have some key differences. Here's a summary:
Axios
- Built-in Features: Axios comes with many built-in features, such as automatic JSON transformation, request and response interceptors, and request cancellation.
- Browser Compatibility: Supports older browsers, including Internet Explorer.
- Error Handling: Axios automatically rejects promises for HTTP error statuses (such as 404 or 500), making error handling easier.
- Request/Response Interceptors: Allows you to modify requests or responses globally in a simple way.
- Request Cancellation: Axios offers an easy way to cancel requests.
Fetch
- Native API: Fetch is a native web API, meaning there is no need to install additional libraries.
- Promise-Based: Uses Promises, but you need to manually check the response status for errors.
- Stream Handling: Fetch supports streaming, which can be useful for handling large responses.
- More Control: Provides more control over requests, but requires more additional code for features such as setting patterns or intercepting requests.
- No Built-in Support for JSON: You need to call .json() on the response object to parse JSON data.
Use Cases
- Use Axios if you need a rich set of out-of-the-box features, especially for complex applications.
- Use Fetch for simpler use cases or when you want to avoid external dependencies.
Usage Example
Axios:
axios.get('/api/data') .then(response => console.log(response.data)) .catch(error => console.error(error)); const options = { url: 'http://localhost/test.htm', method: 'POST', headers: { 'Accept': 'application/json', 'Content-Type': 'application/json;charset=UTF-8' }, data: { a: 10, b: 20 } }; axios(options) .then(response => { console.log(response.status); });
Fetch:
fetch('/api/data') .then(response => { if (!response.ok) { throw new Error('Network response was not ok'); } return response.json(); }) .then(data => console.log(data)) .catch(error => console.error(error)); const url = "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos"; const options = { method: "POST", headers: { Accept: "application/json", "Content-Type": "application/json;charset=UTF-8", }, body: JSON.stringify({ a: 10, b: 20, }), }; fetch(url, options) .then((response) => response.json()) .then((data) => { console.log(data); });
Notes:
- To send data, fetch() uses the body property for a POST request, while Axios uses the data property.
- The data in fetch() is transformed into a string using the JSON.stringify method.
- Axios automatically transforms the data returned from the server, but with fetch(), you need to call the response.json() method to parse the data into a JavaScript object.
- With Axios, the data response provided by the server can be accessed within the data object, while in the fetch() method, the final data can be named with any variable.
Conclusion
Both have their strengths, and the choice often depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you're building a larger application with lots of API interactions, Axios can make some tasks easier, while Fetch is great for straightforward tasks.
Axios offers a user-friendly API that simplifies most HTTP communication tasks. However, if you prefer to use native browser features, you can definitely implement similar functionality yourself with the Fetch API.
As we've explored, it's entirely feasible to replicate Axios' core features using the fetch() method available in browsers. The decision to include a client HTTP library ultimately depends on your comfort with native APIs and your project's specific requirements.
For more information: https://medium.com/trainingcenter/axios-ou-fetch-765e5db9dd59
The above is the detailed content of Axios vs Fetch. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.
