As React applications grow, things can get messy fast—bloated components, hard-to-maintain code, and unexpected bugs. That’s where the SOLID principles come in handy. Originally developed for object-oriented programming, these principles help you write clean, flexible, and scalable code. In this article, I’ll break down each SOLID principle and show how you can use them in React to keep your components organized, your code easier to maintain, and your app ready to grow.
SOLID is an acronym that stands for five design principles aimed at writing clean, maintainable, and scalable code, originally for object-oriented programming but also applicable in React:
S: Single Responsibility Principle: Components should have one job or responsibility.
O: Open/Closed Principle: components should be open for extension **(easily enhanced or customized) but **closed for modification (their core code shouldn't need changes).
L: Liskov Substitution Principle: components should be replaceable by their child components without breaking the app's behavior.
I: Interface Segregation Principle: Components should not be forced to depend on unused functionality.
D: Dependency Inversion Principle: Components should depend on abstractions, not concrete implementations.
Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
Think of it like this: Imagine you have a toy robot that can only do one job, like walking. If you ask it to do a second thing, like talk, it gets confused because it's supposed to focus on walking! If you want another job, get a second robot.
In React, a component should only do one thing. If it does too much, like fetching data, handling form inputs, and showing UI all at once, it gets messy and hard to manage.
const UserCard = () => { const [user, setUser] = useState(null); useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/user') .then(response => response.json()) .then(data => setUser(data)); }, []); return user ? ( <div> <h2 id="user-name">{user.name}</h2> <p>{user.email}</p> </div> ) : <p>Loading...</p>; };
Here, the UserCard is responsible for both fetching data and rendering the UI, which breaks the Single Responsibility Principle.
const useFetchUser = (fetchUser) => { const [user, setUser] = useState(null); useEffect(() => { fetchUser().then(setUser); }, [fetchUser]); return user; }; const UserCard = ({ fetchUser }) => { const user = useFetchUser(fetchUser); return user ? ( <div> <h2 id="user-name">{user.name}</h2> <p>{user.email}</p> </div> ) : ( <p>Loading...</p> ); };
Here, the data fetching logic is moved to a custom hook (useFetchUser), while UserCard focuses solely on rendering the UI, and maintaining SRP.
Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Think of a video game character. You can add new skills to the character (extensions) without changing their core abilities (modifications). That’s what OCP is about—allowing your code to grow and adapt without altering what’s already there.
const Alert = ({ type, message }) => { if (type === 'success') { return <div classname="alert-success">{message}</div>; } if (type === 'error') { return <div classname="alert-error">{message}</div>; } return <div>{message}</div>; };
Here, every time you need a new alert type, you have to modify the Alert component, which breaks OCP. whenever you add conditional rendering or switch case rendering in your component, you are making that component less maintainable, cause you have to add more conditions in the feature and modify that component core code that breaks OCP.
const Alert = ({ className, message }) => ( <div classname="{className}">{message}</div> ); const SuccessAlert = ({ message }) => ( <alert classname="alert-success" message="{message}"></alert> ); const ErrorAlert = ({ message }) => ( <alert classname="alert-error" message="{message}"></alert> );
Now, the Alert component is open for extension (by adding SuccessAlert, ErrorAlert, etc.) but closed for modification because we don’t need to touch the core Alert component to add new alert types.
Want OCP? Prefer composition to inheritance
Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Imagine you have a phone, and then you get a new smartphone. You expect to make calls on the smartphone just like you did with the regular phone. If the smartphone couldn’t make calls, it would be a bad replacement, right? That's what LSP is about—new or child components should work just like the original without breaking things.
const Button = ({ onClick, children }) => ( <button onclick="{onClick}">{children}</button> ); const IconButton = ({ onClick, icon }) => ( <button onclick="{onClick}"> <i classname="{icon}"></i> </button> );
Here, if you swap the Button with the IconButton, you lose the label, breaking the behavior and expectations.
const Button = ({ onClick, children }) => ( <button onclick="{onClick}">{children}</button> ); const IconButton = ({ onClick, icon, label }) => ( <button onclick="{onClick}"> <i classname="{icon}"></i> {label} </button> ); // IconButton now behaves like Button, supporting both icon and label
Now, IconButton properly extends Button's behavior, supporting both icons and labels, so you can swap them without breaking functionality. This follows the Liskov Substitution Principle because the child (IconButton) can replace the parent (Button) without any surprises!
If B component extends A component, anywhere you use A component, you should be able to use B component.
Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Imagine you’re using a remote control to watch TV. You only need a few buttons like power, volume, and channel. If the remote had tons of unnecessary buttons for a DVD player, radio, and lights, it would be annoying to use.
Suppose you have a data table component that takes a lot of props, even if the component using it doesn’t need all of them.
const DataTable = ({ data, sortable, filterable, exportable }) => ( <div> {/* Table rendering */} {sortable && <button>Sort</button>} {filterable && <input placeholder="Filter">} {exportable && <button>Export</button>} </div> );
This component forces all consumers to think about sorting, filtering, and exporting—even if they only want a simple table.
You can split the functionality into smaller components based on what’s needed.
const DataTable = ({ data }) => ( <div> {/* Table rendering */} </div> ); const SortableTable = ({ data }) => ( <div> <datatable data="{data}"></datatable> <button>Sort</button> </div> ); const FilterableTable = ({ data }) => ( <div> <datatable data="{data}"></datatable> <input placeholder="Filter"> </div> );
Now, each table only includes the functionality that’s needed, and you’re not forcing unnecessary props everywhere. This follows ISP, where components only depend on the parts they need.
Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
Imagine you're building with LEGO blocks. You have a robot built with specific pieces. But what if you want to swap out its arms or legs? You shouldn't have to rebuild the whole thing—just swap out the parts. The Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP) is like this: your robot (high-level) doesn't depend on specific parts (low-level); it depends on pieces that you can change easily.
const UserComponent = () => { useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/user').then(...); }, []); return <div>...</div>; };
This directly depends on fetch—you can’t swap it easily.
const UserComponent = ({ fetchUser }) => { useEffect(() => { fetchUser().then(...); }, [fetchUser]); return <div>...</div>; };
Now, the fetchUser function is passed in, and you can easily swap it with another implementation (e.g., mock API, or another data source), keeping everything flexible and testable.
Final Thoughts
Understanding and applying SOLID principles in React can drastically improve the quality of your code. These principles—Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, and Dependency Inversion—help you write components that are more modular, flexible, and easier to maintain. By breaking down responsibilities, keeping code extensible, and making sure each part of your app interacts in predictable ways, you can create React applications that scale more easily and are simpler to debug. In short, SOLID principles lead to cleaner and more maintainable codebases.
The above is the detailed content of SOLID Principles in React: The Key to Writing Maintainable Components. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

Node.js excels at efficient I/O, largely thanks to streams. Streams process data incrementally, avoiding memory overload—ideal for large files, network tasks, and real-time applications. Combining streams with TypeScript's type safety creates a powe

The differences in performance and efficiency between Python and JavaScript are mainly reflected in: 1) As an interpreted language, Python runs slowly but has high development efficiency and is suitable for rapid prototype development; 2) JavaScript is limited to single thread in the browser, but multi-threading and asynchronous I/O can be used to improve performance in Node.js, and both have advantages in actual projects.

JavaScript originated in 1995 and was created by Brandon Ike, and realized the language into C. 1.C language provides high performance and system-level programming capabilities for JavaScript. 2. JavaScript's memory management and performance optimization rely on C language. 3. The cross-platform feature of C language helps JavaScript run efficiently on different operating systems.

JavaScript runs in browsers and Node.js environments and relies on the JavaScript engine to parse and execute code. 1) Generate abstract syntax tree (AST) in the parsing stage; 2) convert AST into bytecode or machine code in the compilation stage; 3) execute the compiled code in the execution stage.

The future trends of Python and JavaScript include: 1. Python will consolidate its position in the fields of scientific computing and AI, 2. JavaScript will promote the development of web technology, 3. Cross-platform development will become a hot topic, and 4. Performance optimization will be the focus. Both will continue to expand application scenarios in their respective fields and make more breakthroughs in performance.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.
