search
HomeBackend DevelopmentGolangDiving Deep: Recursive Solutions for Palindromes and Contiguous Blocks

Diving Deep: Recursive Solutions for Palindromes and Contiguous Blocks

In this article, we will tackle two tasks from the Perl Weekly Challenge #288: finding the closest palindrome and determining the size of the largest contiguous block in a matrix. Both solutions will be implemented recursively in Perl and Go.

Table of Contents

  1. Closest Palindrome
  2. Contiguous Block
  3. Conclusion

Closest Palindrome

The first task is to find the closest palindrome that does not include itself.

The closest palindrome is defined as the one that minimizes the absolute difference between two integers.

If there are multiple candidates, the smallest one should be returned.

Task Description

Input: A string, $str, which represents an integer.

Output: The closest palindrome as a string.

Examples

  • Input: "123"
    Output: "121"

  • Input: "2"
    Output: "1"
    There are two closest palindromes: "1" and "3". Therefore, we return the smallest "1".

  • Input: "1400"
    Output: "1441"

  • Input: "1001"
    Output: "999"

Solution

Perl Implementation

In this implementation, we utilize a recursive approach to find the closest palindrome that is not equal to the original number. The recursive function explores both lower and upper bounds around the original number:

  • It checks if the current candidates (lower and upper) are valid palindromes (and not equal to the original).
  • If neither candidate is valid, the function recursively decrements the lower candidate and increments the upper candidate until it finds a valid palindrome.

This recursive strategy effectively narrows down the search space, ensuring that we identify the closest palindrome while adhering to the problem's constraints.

sub is_palindrome {
    my ($num) = @_;
    return $num eq reverse($num);
}

sub find_closest {
    my ($lower, $upper, $original) = @_;
    return $lower if is_palindrome($lower) && $lower != $original;
    return $upper if is_palindrome($upper) && $upper != $original;
    return find_closest($lower - 1, $upper + 1, $original) if $lower > 0;
    return $upper + 1;
}

sub closest_palindrome {
    my ($str) = @_;
    my $num = int($str);
    return find_closest($num - 1, $num + 1, $num);
}

Go Implementation

The Go implementation follows a similar recursive strategy. It also checks the candidates around the original number, using recursion to adjust the bounds until a valid palindrome is found.

package main

import (
    "strconv"
)

func isPalindrome(num int) bool {
    reversed := 0
    original := num

    for num > 0 {
        digit := num % 10
        reversed = reversed*10 + digit
        num /= 10
    }

    return original == reversed
}

func findClosest(lower, upper, original int) string {
    switch {
        case isPalindrome(lower) && lower != original:
            return strconv.Itoa(lower)
        case isPalindrome(upper) && upper != original:
            return strconv.Itoa(upper)
        case lower > 0:
            return findClosest(lower-1, upper+1, original)
        default:
            return strconv.Itoa(upper + 1)
    }
}

func closestPalindrome(str string) string {
    num, _ := strconv.Atoi(str)
    return findClosest(num-1, num+1, num)
}

Hier ist die erweiterte Definition für den Contiguous Block:

Contiguous Block

The second task is to determine the size of the largest contiguous block in a given matrix, where all cells contain either x or o.

A contiguous block consists of elements containing the same symbol that share an edge (not just a corner) with other elements in the block, creating a connected area.

Task Description

Input: A rectangular matrix containing x and o.

Output: The size of the largest contiguous block.

Examples

  • Input:

    [
        ['x', 'x', 'x', 'x', 'o'],
        ['x', 'o', 'o', 'o', 'o'],
        ['x', 'o', 'o', 'o', 'o'],
        ['x', 'x', 'x', 'o', 'o'],
    ]
    

Output: 11
There is a block of 9 contiguous cells containing x and a block of 11 contiguous cells containing o.

  • Input:

    [
        ['x', 'x', 'x', 'x', 'x'],
        ['x', 'o', 'o', 'o', 'o'],
        ['x', 'x', 'x', 'x', 'o'],
        ['x', 'o', 'o', 'o', 'o'],
    ]
    

Output: 11
There is a block of 11 contiguous cells containing x and a block of 9 contiguous cells containing o.

  • Input:

    [
        ['x', 'x', 'x', 'o', 'o'],
        ['o', 'o', 'o', 'x', 'x'],
        ['o', 'x', 'x', 'o', 'o'],
        ['o', 'o', 'o', 'x', 'x'],
    ]
    

Output: 7
There is a block of 7 contiguous cells containing o, two other 2-cell blocks of o, three 2-cell blocks of x and one 3-cell block of x.

Solution

Perl Implementation

In this implementation, we utilize a recursive depth-first search (DFS) approach to determine the size of the largest contiguous block in a matrix. The main function initializes a visited matrix to track which cells have been explored. It iterates through each cell, invoking the recursive DFS function whenever it encounters an unvisited cell.

The DFS function explores all four possible directions (up, down, left, right) from the current cell. It counts the size of the contiguous block by recursively calling itself on neighboring cells that share the same symbol and have not been visited. This recursive method effectively aggregates the size of the block while ensuring that each cell is only counted once.

sub largest_contiguous_block {
    my ($matrix) = @_;
    my $rows = @$matrix;
    my $cols = @{$matrix->[0]};
    my @visited = map { [(0) x $cols] } 1..$rows;

    my $max_size = 0;

    for my $r (0 .. $rows - 1) {
        for my $c (0 .. $cols - 1) {
            my $symbol = $matrix->[$r][$c];
            my $size = dfs($matrix, \@visited, $r, $c, $symbol);
            $max_size = $size if $size > $max_size;
        }
    }

    return $max_size;
}

sub dfs {
    my ($matrix, $visited, $row, $col, $symbol) = @_;

    return 0 if $row = @$matrix || $col = @{$matrix->[0]}
                || $visited->[$row][$col] || $matrix->[$row][$col] ne $symbol;

    $visited->[$row][$col] = 1;
    my $count = 1;

    $count += dfs($matrix, $visited, $row + 1, $col, $symbol);
    $count += dfs($matrix, $visited, $row - 1, $col, $symbol);
    $count += dfs($matrix, $visited, $row, $col + 1, $symbol);
    $count += dfs($matrix, $visited, $row, $col - 1, $symbol);

    return $count;
}

Go Implementation

The Go implementation mirrors this recursive DFS strategy. It similarly traverses the matrix and uses recursion to explore contiguous cells with the same symbol.

package main

func largestContiguousBlock(matrix [][]rune) int {
    rows := len(matrix)
    if rows == 0 {
        return 0
    }
    cols := len(matrix[0])
    visited := make([][]bool, rows)
    for i := range visited {
        visited[i] = make([]bool, cols)
    }

    maxSize := 0

    for r := 0; r  maxSize {
                maxSize = size
            }
        }
    }

    return maxSize
}

func dfs(matrix [][]rune, visited [][]bool, row, col int, symbol rune) int {
    if row = len(matrix) || col = len(matrix[0]) ||
        visited[row][col] || matrix[row][col] != symbol {
        return 0
    }

    visited[row][col] = true
    count := 1

    count += dfs(matrix, visited, row+1, col, symbol)
    count += dfs(matrix, visited, row-1, col, symbol)
    count += dfs(matrix, visited, row, col+1, symbol)
    count += dfs(matrix, visited, row, col-1, symbol)

    return count
}

Conclusion

In this article, we explored two intriguing challenges from the Perl Weekly Challenge #288: finding the closest palindrome and determining the size of the largest contiguous block in a matrix.

For the first task, both the Perl and Go implementations effectively utilized recursion to navigate around the original number, ensuring the closest palindrome was found efficiently.

In the second task, the recursive depth-first search approach in both languages allowed for a thorough exploration of the matrix, resulting in an accurate count of the largest contiguous block of identical symbols.

These challenges highlight the versatility of recursion as a powerful tool in solving algorithmic problems, showcasing its effectiveness in both Perl and Go. If you're interested in further exploration or have any questions, feel free to reach out!

You can find the complete code, including tests, on GitHub.

The above is the detailed content of Diving Deep: Recursive Solutions for Palindromes and Contiguous Blocks. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Golang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsGolang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsApr 21, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedGolang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedApr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Why Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedWhy Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedApr 21, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed ComparisonGolang vs. C : Performance and Speed ComparisonApr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Is Golang Faster Than C  ? Exploring the LimitsIs Golang Faster Than C ? Exploring the LimitsApr 20, 2025 am 12:19 AM

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingGolang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang vs. C  : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceGolang vs. C : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisGolang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisApr 20, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

DVWA

DVWA

Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

MantisBT

MantisBT

Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

mPDF

mPDF

mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),