


Unleashing MongoDB: Why Cursor-Based Pagination Outperforms Offset-Based Pagination Every Time!
Pagination is a critical part of any database operation when dealing with large datasets. It allows you to split data into manageable chunks, making it easier to browse, process, and display. MongoDB provides two common pagination methods: offset-based and cursor-based. While both methods serve the same purpose, they differ significantly in performance and usability, especially as the dataset grows.
Let's dive into the two approaches and see why cursor-based pagination often outperforms offset-based pagination.
1. Offset-Based Pagination
Offset-based pagination is straightforward. It retrieves a specific number of records starting from a given offset. For example, the first page might retrieve records 0-9, the second page retrieves records 10-19, and so on.
However, this method has a significant drawback: as you move to higher pages, the query becomes slower. This is because the database needs to skip over the records from the previous pages, which involves scanning through them.
Here’s the code for offset-based pagination:
async function offset_based_pagination(params) { const { page = 5, limit = 100 } = params; const skip = (page - 1) * limit; const results = await collection.find({}).skip(skip).limit(limit).toArray(); console.log(`Offset-based pagination (Page ${page}):`, results.length, "page", page, "skip", skip, "limit", limit); }
2. Cursor-Based Pagination
Cursor-based pagination, also known as keyset pagination, relies on a unique identifier (e.g., an ID or timestamp) to paginate through the records. Instead of skipping a certain number of records, it uses the last retrieved record as the reference point for fetching the next set.
This approach is more efficient because it avoids the need to scan the records before the current page. As a result, the query time remains consistent, regardless of how deep into the dataset you go.
Here's the code for cursor-based pagination:
async function cursor_based_pagination(params) { const { lastDocumentId, limit = 100 } = params; const query = lastDocumentId ? { documentId: { $gt: lastDocumentId } } : {}; const results = await collection .find(query) .sort({ documentId: 1 }) .limit(limit) .toArray(); console.log("Cursor-based pagination:", results.length); }
In this example, lastDocumentId is the ID of the last document from the previous page. When querying for the next page, the database fetches documents with an ID greater than this value, ensuring a seamless transition to the next set of records.
3. Performance Comparison
Let’s see how these two methods perform with a large dataset.
async function testMongoDB() { console.time("MongoDB Insert Time:"); await insertMongoDBRecords(); console.timeEnd("MongoDB Insert Time:"); // Create an index on the documentId field await collection.createIndex({ documentId: 1 }); console.log("Index created on documentId field"); console.time("Offset-based pagination Time:"); await offset_based_pagination({ page: 2, limit: 250000 }); console.timeEnd("Offset-based pagination Time:"); console.time("Cursor-based pagination Time:"); await cursor_based_pagination({ lastDocumentId: 170000, limit: 250000 }); console.timeEnd("Cursor-based pagination Time:"); await client.close(); }
In the performance test, you’ll notice that the offset-based pagination takes longer as the page number increases, whereas the cursor-based pagination remains consistent, making it the better choice for large datasets. This example also demonstrates the power of indexing as well. Try to remove index & then see the result as well!
Why Indexing is Important
Without an index, MongoDB would need to perform a collection scan, which means it has to look at each document in the collection to find the relevant data. This is inefficient, especially when your dataset grows. Indexes allow MongoDB to efficiently to find the documents that match your query conditions, significantly speeding up query performance.
In the context of cursor-based pagination, the index ensures that fetching the next set of documents (based on documentId) is quick and does not degrade in performance as more documents are added to the collection.
Conclusion
While offset-based pagination is easy to implement, it can become inefficient with large datasets due to the need to scan through records. Cursor-based pagination, on the other hand, provides a more scalable solution, keeping performance consistent regardless of the dataset size. If you are working with large collections in MongoDB, it’s worth considering cursor-based pagination for a smoother and faster experience.
Here's complete index.js for you to run locally:
const { MongoClient } = require("mongodb"); const uri = "mongodb://localhost:27017"; const client = new MongoClient(uri); client.connect(); const db = client.db("testdb"); const collection = db.collection("testCollection"); async function insertMongoDBRecords() { try { let bulkOps = []; for (let i = 0; i 0) { await collection.bulkWrite(bulkOps); console.log("? Inserted records till now -> ", bulkOps.length); } console.log("MongoDB Insertion Completed"); } catch (err) { console.error("Error in inserting records", err); } } async function offset_based_pagination(params) { const { page = 5, limit = 100 } = params; const skip = (page - 1) * limit; const results = await collection.find({}).skip(skip).limit(limit).toArray(); console.log(`Offset-based pagination (Page ${page}):`, results.length, "page", page, "skip", skip, "limit", limit); } async function cursor_based_pagination(params) { const { lastDocumentId, limit = 100 } = params; const query = lastDocumentId ? { documentId: { $gt: lastDocumentId } } : {}; const results = await collection .find(query) .sort({ documentId: 1 }) .limit(limit) .toArray(); console.log("Cursor-based pagination:", results.length); } async function testMongoDB() { console.time("MongoDB Insert Time:"); await insertMongoDBRecords(); console.timeEnd("MongoDB Insert Time:"); // Create an index on the documentId field await collection.createIndex({ documentId: 1 }); console.log("Index created on documentId field"); console.time("Offset-based pagination Time:"); await offset_based_pagination({ page: 2, limit: 250000 }); console.timeEnd("Offset-based pagination Time:"); console.time("Cursor-based pagination Time:"); await cursor_based_pagination({ lastDocumentId: 170000, limit: 250000 }); console.timeEnd("Cursor-based pagination Time:"); await client.close(); } testMongoDB();
The above is the detailed content of Unleashing MongoDB: Why Cursor-Based Pagination Outperforms Offset-Based Pagination Every Time!. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version
