If you've used Nuxt you've probably encountered the handy useFetch composable:
<script setup lang="ts"> const { data, status, error, refresh, clear } = await useFetch('/api/modules') </script>
This simplifies fetching data, but what if you have a multitude of APIs that all require authentication? Adding headers to each call gets tedious fast.
Enter interceptors.
To add global interceptors, we'll build a custom composable wrapper around $fetch. This is especially valuable when your API calls consistently need authorization headers.
As a foundation, let's use the same project from my previous blog post on Authentication in Nuxt 3.
let's start by creating a new composable under composable folder composables/useAuthFetch.ts
import type { UseFetchOptions } from 'nuxt/app'; const useAuthFetch = (url: string | (() => string), options: UseFetchOptions<null> = {}) => { const customFetch = $fetch.create({ baseURL: 'https://dummyjson.com', onRequest({ options }) { const token = useCookie('token'); if (token?.value) { console.log('[fetch request] Authorization header created'); options.headers = options.headers || {}; options.headers.Authorization = `Bearer ${token.value}`; } }, onResponse({ response }) { console.info('onResponse ', { endpoint: response.url, status: response?.status, }); }, onResponseError({ response }) { const statusMessage = response?.status === 401 ? 'Unauthorized' : 'Response failed'; console.error('onResponseError ', { endpoint: response.url, status: response?.status, statusMessage, }); throw showError({ statusCode: response?.status, statusMessage, fatal: true, }); }, }); return useFetch(url, { ...options, $fetch: customFetch, }); }; export default useAuthFetch; </null>
Explanation:
- useAuthFetch: Our custom composable. It takes the same arguments as useFetch.
- customFetch: Creates a customized $fetch instance with interceptors.
- baseURL: By using baseURL option, ofetch prepends it for trailing/leading slashes and query search params for baseURL using ufo:
- onRequest: This interceptor runs before every fetch call. It grabs the token from a cookie and adds the Authorization header if a token is present.
- onResponse: Runs after a successful fetch, providing logging.
- onResponseError: Handles fetch errors, logs details, and throws an error using showError (assuming you have this defined).
- return useFetch(...): Finally, we call the original useFetch, but pass in our customFetch to handle the actual requests.
you can find out more about the interceptors here
Now, whenever you need to fetch data from an authenticated API, simply use useAuthFetch instead of useFetch, and the authorization will be handled seamlessly.
<template> <div v-if="user">Welcome back {{ user.email }}</div> <div v-else>loading...</div> </template> <script lang="ts" setup> const { data: user } = await useAuthFetch('/auth/me'); </script>
When you inspect the network call you can see the baseUrl is correct and the Authorization header is present
Logging
In my interceptors, I have added some logs this can be useful if you have tools like Sentry in your application.
How to add Sentry to Nuxt: https://www.lichter.io/articles/nuxt3-sentry-recipe/
in the onRequest interceptor you could add a breadcrumb to sentry
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/vue'; Sentry.addBreadcrumb({ type: 'http', category: 'xhr', message: ``, data: { url: `${options.baseURL}${request}`, }, level: 'info', });
if your backend returns a tracingId you could also add a tag and context with sentry to link errors with an endpoint
onResponseError you could add context breadcrumb and tag
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/vue'; Sentry.setContext('http-error', { endpoint: response?.url, tracingId: 123, status: response?.status, }); Sentry.addBreadcrumb({ type: 'http', category: 'xhr', message: ``, data: { url: response?.url, status_code: response?.status, }, level: 'error', }); Sentry.setTag('tracingId', '123');
replace tracingIdwith whatever custom tracing log your backend returns
The above is the detailed content of Custom fetch with Interceptors and logs in nuxt 3. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
