


When building modern web applications, selecting the right JavaScript library can make all the difference in performance, scalability, and maintainability.
Currently, So many JavaScript libraries available, choosing the right one can be little difficult and The wrong choice can lead to performance issues, increased complexity, and wasted development time.
Amoung all the Javascript Libraries React is more popular and developer friendly. But wait, There is another library as look like react, Its called Preact. Another confusion.?
Then what we can do. Choose React or Preact ?? ??
So, in this article, we'll delve into the differences between React and Preact, exploring their strengths, weaknesses, and use cases. By the end, you'll able to take decision about which library best suits your project.
Light ?, Camera ?, Action ? and Let's get started.
Brief Overview of React & Preact
React and Preact are two popular JavaScript libraries used for building user interfaces. While React is a well-established leader and Preact has gained popularity as a lightweight alternative. Both libraries share similarities, but their differences can significantly impact your project.
What is the Key Differences
We'll compare React and Preact with all the areas, including:
- Size and performance
- API and compatibility
- Ecosystem and community
- Learning curve
Not enough for you? Let's time travel and going back to see history of the both libraries.
History of React
React was developed by Facebook and released in 2013. Initially, it was used for Facebook's News Feed and later open-sourced. React's primary goal is to provide an efficient and scalable way to build complex user interfaces.
Milestones of React
- 2013: Initial release
- 2015: React Native launch (for mobile app development)
- 2017: React Fiber release (rewrite of React's core algorithm)
- 2020: React 17 release (improved performance and concurrency)
And still evolving.....
History of Preact
Preact is created by Jason Miller and it was released in 2015. Preact aims to provide a lightweight, compatible, and performant alternative to React.
Milestones of Preact
- 2015: Initial release
- 2016: Preact 2 release (improved compatibility with React)
- 2018: Preact 8 release (enhanced performance and debugging)
- 2020: Preact 10 release (further performance optimizations)
And still evolving or not. I don't know. Because I am React Lover ???
Key Characteristics
Let's see some of the cool things of both libraries.
Feature | React | Preact | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2013 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Size | ~30KB | ~3KB | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance | Optimized | Enhanced | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community | Large | Growing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compatibility | Wide support | Most React libraries | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Learning Curve | Moderate | Easy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ecosystem | Robust | Emerging | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
License | MIT | MIT |
Now that we've explored the backgrounds and key characteristics of React and Preact, let's dive into their key features and compare them.
Key Features
React and Preact share many key features, but there are some differences in their implementation and focus. let's see.
React Key Features
- Components: Building blocks of React applications
- Virtual DOM: Efficient rendering and updating
- JSX: Syntax extension for HTML-like code
- State and Props: Manage component data
- Lifecycle Methods: Hooks for component initialization, update, and destruction
- Context API: Share data between components without props
- Hooks: Reusable functions for state and side effects
Preact Key Features
- Components: Similar to React, but with a smaller footprint
- Virtual DOM: Optimized for performance
- JSX: Compatible with React's JSX syntax
- State and Props: Similar to React, but with some differences
- Lifecycle Methods: Similar to React, but with some variations
- Compat: Compatibility layer for React libraries
- PRPL: Performance-focused architecture
Main Differences
- Size: Preact's smaller size (~3KB) vs. React's (~30KB)
- Performance: Preact's optimized Virtual DOM and PRPL architecture
- Complexity: React's more comprehensive feature set vs. Preact's simplicity
Now that we've explored the key features of React and Preact, let's compare their ecosystems and communities.
Ecosystem and Community
A strong ecosystem and active community are crucial for a JavaScript library's success. But as per my research i got few of things, Pardon me.
React Ecosystem
- Large Community: Over 1 million developers
- Wide Adoption: Used by Facebook, Instagram, Netflix, and more
- Extensive Libraries: Redux, React Router, Material-UI, and many more
- Tools and Integrations: Webpack, Babel, ESLint, and others
- Documentation and Resources: Official docs, tutorials, and blogs
Preact Ecosystem
- Growing Community: Thousands of developers
- Emerging Adoption: Used by companies like Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla
- Compat Layer: Supports most React libraries
- Lightweight Alternatives: Preact-Router, Preact-Material, etc.
- Documentation and Resources: Official docs, tutorials, and community support
As per my personal research, Preact grows very well and looks like one day, Preact surpass React.
Community Engagement
- Reactiflux (React community): 100k+ members
- Preact Discord: 5k+ members
- Stack Overflow: React (234k questions), Preact (1.5k questions)
Let's compare their performance and benchmarks.
Performance and Benchmarks
Performance is a critical aspect of any JavaScript library. But Who Cares ? ?
React Performance
- Virtual DOM: Optimizes rendering and updating
- Batched Updates: Reduces number of DOM mutations
- ShouldComponentUpdate: Optimizes component re-renders
- React Fiber: Improves rendering performance
Preact Performance
- Optimized Virtual DOM: Faster rendering and updating
- Simplified Component Model: Reduced overhead
- PRPL Architecture: Performance-focused design
- Tiny Size: ~3KB gzipped
Benchmarks
Benchmark | React | Preact | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
100-200ms | 20-50ms | |||||||||||||||
Update Time | 50-100ms | 10-30ms | |||||||||||||||
Memory Usage | 5-10MB | 1-3MB | |||||||||||||||
Page Load Time | 1-2s | 0.5-1s |
Performance Optimisation Support
We all know this is article is all about library performance oriented and it doesn't matter, If we know this techniques or not ?♂️. So, don't panic. Because half of the world don't know and We are one of them.
Technique | React | Preact |
---|---|---|
Code Splitting | ✅ | ✅ |
Tree Shaking | ✅ | ✅ |
Lazy Loading | ✅ | ✅ |
Caching | ✅ | ❌ |
But, I have surprising news for you.
- Facebook: Uses React for performance-critical applications
- Google: Uses Preact for some performance-oriented applications
We talk so much about features, performance, optimisation and many more unbelievable things. Actually I don't know ? So, instead of spreading cheese on code, Let's see use cases of each libraries.
Use Cases
Both React and Preact are suitable for various applications, but their differences make them more suitable for specific use cases.
React Use Cases
- Complex Enterprise Applications: Large-scale, complex apps with multiple integrations.
- High-Traffic Websites: High-traffic websites requiring optimised performance.
- Real-Time Applications: Apps requiring real-time updates, such as live analytics.
- Mobile Apps: React Native for cross-platform mobile app development.
Preact Use Cases
- Small to Medium-Sized Applications: Simple, fast, and lightweight apps.
- Progressive Web Apps: Fast, offline-capable web apps.
- Real-Time Updates: Apps requiring fast, efficient updates.
- Server-Side Rendering: Fast, lightweight SSR solutions.
What to Choose React and Preact?
- Consider Complexity: React for complex, Preact for simple.
- Evaluate Performance: Preact for fast, lightweight.
- Assess Scalability: React for large-scale, Preact for small-medium.
- Review Ecosystem: React for extensive libraries, Preact for compatibility.
Understand?? It's Okay, Don't Try!! ?
Finally.... I can write more about this but, I am lazy person, I will share Part 2.
Conclusion
React and Preact are both powerful JavaScript libraries for building user interfaces. While React ace in scalability, ecosystem, and enterprise applications, Preact shines in performance, simplicity, and small to medium-sized applications.
At the end, Its depends on developer and their perspective. I wrote so much about this libraries (So called Marketing) And What I Got? Like, Share, Subscribe and Respect (Sometimes). ??
I would like to tell you, You won't find comparison like this. This type of comparison need so much time and efforts and Time is Money. And I am looking for that only for support. Also if you have little time and you really want to see something, checkout TechAlgoSpotlight.com. I wrote this article for medium but I love DEV ???
The above is the detailed content of React vs Preact: Choose the Right JavaScript Library for Your Project in 4. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

Node.js excels at efficient I/O, largely thanks to streams. Streams process data incrementally, avoiding memory overload—ideal for large files, network tasks, and real-time applications. Combining streams with TypeScript's type safety creates a powe

The differences in performance and efficiency between Python and JavaScript are mainly reflected in: 1) As an interpreted language, Python runs slowly but has high development efficiency and is suitable for rapid prototype development; 2) JavaScript is limited to single thread in the browser, but multi-threading and asynchronous I/O can be used to improve performance in Node.js, and both have advantages in actual projects.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.
