an't take the California out of the girl.output: title: F%$K Bad Research: I spent over a month analyzing a bitcoin mining study and all I got was this trauma response.

"We must confess that our adversaries have a marked advantage over us in the discussion. In very few words they can announce a half-truth; and in order to demonstrate that it is incomplete, we are obliged to have recourse to long and dry dissertations.” — Frédéric Bastiat, Economic Sophisms, First Series (1845)

, you can’t take the California out of the girl. I was skeptical, but I agreed to give it a shot.

We walked into this honky tonk joint and I was immediately overwhelmed. The place was packed with people, all two-stepping in unison to the live country band on stage. I looked around and saw a few other groups of people who also looked lost, like they didn’t belong in this place. But everyone else seemed to be having a good time.

One of my companions went up to the bar and ordered a round of drinks. While we waited for our drinks, I started talking to a guy who was standing next to me. He told me that he was a bitcoin miner and that he had been coming to this honky tonk joint for years. He said that he loved the atmosphere and the people.

I asked him what he thought about the recent bitcoin energy use studies and he said that he didn’t pay much attention to them. He said that he was more interested in the technology and the community. I told him that I was a journalist and that I was writing an article about the studies. He seemed interested in what I had to say and he asked me a few questions about my article.

After a while, our drinks arrived and we all started two-stepping. I was terrible at first, but I slowly started to get the hang of it. By the end of the night, I was actually having a lot of fun.

As we were leaving the honky tonk joint, I thanked my companions for bringing me there. I told them that I had a great time and that I learned a lot. They seemed happy to hear that I enjoyed myself and they invited me to go out with them again the next night.

I went back to my hotel room and started thinking about the bitcoin miner I had met at the honky tonk joint. I realized that he was the perfect person to help me understand the other side of the story. I decided to email him and ask him if he would be willing to talk to me for my article.

The next morning, I woke up and checked my email. I had a message from the bitcoin miner I had met at the honky tonk joint. He said that he would be happy to talk to me for my article and that he would be available to meet up later that day.

I met up with the bitcoin miner at a coffee shop near the conference center. We sat down and I started asking him questions about his experience with bitcoin mining. He told me that he had been mining bitcoin for several years and that he had seen a lot of changes in the industry during that time. He said that he was impressed by how quickly bitcoin had grown and how it had become more mainstream.

I asked him what he thought about the recent bitcoin energy use studies and he said that he thought they were biased. He said that the studies used flawed data and that they didn’t take into account the efficiency gains that had been made by bitcoin miners in recent years. He also said that the studies ignored the fact that bitcoin mining was a competitive industry and that miners were constantly looking for ways to reduce their costs.

I thanked him for his time and I told him that I would be sure to include his perspective in my article. As I was leaving, he stopped me and said, “Good luck with your article. I hope you can help people understand the other side of the story.”

I went back to my hotel room and started writing my article. I included the perspectives of both the bitcoin miners and the researchers who had conducted the energy use studies. I also included a discussion of the limitations of the studies and the need for more research.

When I finished writing my article, I sent it to my editor for review. A few days later, I received an email from my editor saying that the article had been accepted for publication. I was relieved and excited to see my work finally being published.

I hoped that my article would help people understand the complex issue of bitcoin mining’s energy use. I also hoped that it would encourage more people to get involved in the discussion and to help shape the future of bitcoin mining.output: This article is featured in Bitcoin Magazine’s “The Halving Issue”. Click here to get your copy. It is also report #1 of the "FUD Fighters" series powered by HIVE Digital Technologies LTD.

F%$K Bad Research: I spent over a month analyzing a bitcoin mining study and all I got was this trauma response.

「私たちは、議論において私たちの敵が私たちよりも著しく有利であることを告白しなければなりません。ほんの短い言葉で、彼らは半分の真実を発表することができます。そしてそれが不完全であることを証明するには、長くて無味乾燥な論文に頼らざるを得ません。」 — フレデリック・バスティア、経済詭弁、第 1 シリーズ (1845 年)

「でたらめに反論するのに必要なエネルギーの量は、必要な量よりも桁違いに大きい

」

The above is the detailed content of an't take the California out of the girl.output: title: F%$K Bad Research: I spent over a month analyzing a bitcoin mining study and all I got was this trauma response.. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!