Ripple's CLO Supports Kraken in Its SEC Battle and Praising the Blow to the SEC's Enforcement Strategy

Santori criticizes the SEC's enforcement-based approach to regulation as impractical and unsustainable.

Ripple's Chief Legal Officer (CLO), Stuart Alderoty, has come out in strong support of Kraken in its legal battle against the U.S. SEC. With a spirited defense, Alderoty has highlighted a key takeaway from the court's recent decision: the concept of a “crypto asset security” is not recognized. According to Alderoty, this deals a blow to the SEC's enforcement strategy, which has largely depended on legal disputes to regulate the cryptocurrency industry.

While the judgment was met with enthusiasm by experts and the crypto community, the SEC's overreach continues. Let's delve deeper.

The tension escalated when U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick denied Kraken's motion to dismiss the SEC's lawsuit, requiring the exchange to file a response within 20 days. However, despite this setback, Kraken's Chief Legal Officer, Marco Santori, found a silver lining in the court's decision.

Santori pointed out that the court recognized the ambiguity in the SEC's argument that Kraken's tokens are securities, describing the regulator's position as “unclear at best and confusing at worst.”

Santori also drew parallels between the court's decision and Ripple's legal challenges. He noted that the court, like in Ripple's case, distinguished between a crypto token and the agreements related to it, suggesting that the SEC's broad claim that all tokens are securities is flawed. To proceed, the SEC would need to demonstrate that each transaction on Kraken qualifies as a security—a task that Santori believes the regulator is incapable of fulfilling.

Bill Morgan highlights that the SEC vs Kraken decision supports Judge Torres' earlier ruling in the SEC vs Ripple case, affirming that the token itself is not considered a security.

The decision in SEC v Kraken today is another endorsement of Judge Torres’ reasoning in the SEC v Ripple decision that the token itself is not a security.

The SEC's method of regulating the crypto industry through enforcement actions was also criticized by Santori. He cautioned that applying this approach across the industry would result in lengthy, costly litigation, with billions of transactions needing to be examined. According to him, such a method is neither practical nor sustainable. Kraken, with support from figures like Alderoty, is preparing for a protracted battle, confident in its chances of success.

As the SEC's scrutiny of Kraken and other crypto exchanges, like Coinbase, intensifies, the industry is ramping up its compliance efforts. Other crypto companies, such as Binance, are also responding to the SEC's oversight by bolstering their compliance measures in response to this ongoing pressure.

Let's discuss: Is the SEC's regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies the right one?

As Kraken and other crypto exchanges fight for their right to operate, it's clear that the future of the industry depends on a fair and balanced regulatory framework. Will that happen? Only time will tell.

The above is the detailed content of Ripple's CLO Supports Kraken in Its SEC Battle and Praising the Blow to the SEC's Enforcement Strategy. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!