The Future of AI: Centralized vs. Decentralized

The future of artificial intelligence is far from clear, and although many adherents are confident it will bring immense benefits to society

The future of artificial intelligence is uncertain, but many believe it will bring great benefits to society. However, there are also concerns that few people will actually see these benefits.

AI has the potential to create a bright future, but it could also become very dark if it is not done correctly. Much will depend on who leads the AI revolution and whether or not those pioneers are centralized or decentralized.

It is becoming increasingly clear that decentralized AI will be necessary to prevent the industry from becoming over-regulated, a move that will likely stifle the ability of anyone but the richest "big tech" corporations to innovate.

Big tech wants to regulate AI and has become increasingly vocal about the need to do so, citing the need for "safety" and "protection" of consumers, among other reasons. But is that really the only reason they want to put more rules in place, or do they have more sinister motivations? It's hard to believe they don't.

Most people will agree that AI is one of the most transformative new technologies to arise since the emergence of the internet itself. AI has incredible potential - it can help scientists to invest new, lifesaving drugs for some of the worst diseases, it can help to create personalized tutors that will make our kids smarter, and it has already led to the development of "intelligent" assistants that can help workers in multiple industries to get their work done faster.

AI may also be the key development that finally makes autonomous cars a reality on our roads. And it goes without saying that it will help some of the biggest technology companies and their shareholders become immensely rich.

But the question of which of those innovators will benefit the most depends almost entirely on what sort of regulation is imposed on AI. Over-regulation in the AI industry will snuff out the chances of anyone but the richest corporations from being able to successfully innovate and make this future become a reality.

A dystopian prediction maybe, but there are many precedents that suggest it will come true.

Big companies like regulation because it means that they're the only ones who're able to comply. They have the money available to pay the legions of lawyers necessary to ensure that their new innovations don't fall foul of the myriad of rules that regulation will inevitably bring.

Proof of this can be seen in the U.S. banking and healthcare sectors. The tidal wave of regulations that followed the Great Recession in the late 2000s was one of the best things that ever happened to U.S. banks. Since the Dodd-Frank Act came into force in 2010, the stocks of America's biggest banks have skyrocketed, with JPMorgan gaining more than 450%.

That same year also saw the passing of former President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, which was supposed to make healthcare insurance more affordable. Whether or not it had the intended effect remains a matter of debate, but it turned out to be fantastic for healthcare insurance providers like UnitedHealth, whose stock has gained more than 1,600% in the years since.

Regulation creates incredibly burdensome laws that smother the prospects of any innovative startups looking to create disruption, and it will do the same in the AI industry.

Regulation will result in big tech totally dominating the AI industry, meaning that all of the power, potential and profits will be held by a very small and highly centralized group of individuals.

This is undesirable, for obvious reasons. As AI slowly arises to replace traditional search engines, it will give the few corporations that control it the ability to censor what we see online and influence the way we think.

Fortunately there is an alternative future for AI. Instead of pursuing regulation, we can instead build a decentralized foundation that ensures the power of this technology remains open and ripe for innovation.

This means building the next generation of AI networks on blockchain. Yes, the same technology that underpins the often-maligned cryptocurrency industry.

Blockchain is a decentralized ledger that enables two individuals to transact in a trustless way, without any intermediaries to "regulate" their transactions. Bitcoin uses blockchain to ensure people can send and receive funds without taking any risks, and Ethereum takes it further with its innovative "smart contracts", paving the way for people to save, borrow, lend and invest their money without any involvement of banks, brokers or governments.

블록체인은 AI를 더욱 발전시킬 수 있습니다. 이 기술은 거대 기술 기업의 통제를 받지 않는 분산형 AI 시스템을 위한 플랫폼으로 활용될 수 있지만 그만큼 강력해질 수 있습니다. ChatGPT와 같은 독점 모델은 기업 소유의 거대한 데이터 센터에서 호스팅되는 반면, Qubic과 같은 분산형 AI 네트워크는 전 세계에 분산된 수천 개의 분산 노드(개인, 사용자 소유 컴퓨터)에서 호스팅됩니다. 이는 모든 사람이 소유하고 참여하는 사람들에게 비용을 지불하는 AI 네트워크와 같습니다.

블록체인의 잠재력은 제어의 분산화뿐만 아니라 컴퓨팅 리소스의 민주화에도 있습니다. 현재 AI는 Google, OpenAI

등이 지배하고 있습니다.

The above is the detailed content of The Future of AI: Centralized vs. Decentralized. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!