ETH core developers criticize Ethereum for becoming increasingly centralized! V God proposes 8 major arguments to refute

This site (120bTC.coM): Péter Szilágyi, the head of the Ethereum core development team, recently tweeted to criticize the development direction of Ethereum and expressed concern about Ethereum’s upcoming PeerDAS upgrade. He pointed out that some of the changes covered by the PeerDAS proposal include plans to increase the blob data size to 32MB, which will result in extremely high network bandwidth requirements for block production, possibly reaching 2.5Gbit/s, hindering the participation of home nodes that usually have simpler computing equipment. The Ethereum network, this goes against the decentralized ethos of the blockchain: it's actually killing home stakers, which is not what I expected when I joined Ethereum.

Péter Szilágyi criticized that Ethereum is going astray. The research team has fully accepted all centralized ideas, as long as it can be verified. On the surface it is decentralized verification, but in essence it is centralized control. His This strong wording aroused widespread concern in the Ethereum community and triggered a fierce debate about the core principles of the Ethereum network.

V God’s 8 major clarifications

After Péter Szilágyi’s remarks caused discussion, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin also responded to his accusations through a series of tweets on the 27th, categorically denying any intention to centralize the Ethereum network. Emphasizing that the Ethereum team has been deeply involved in discussions aimed at minimizing centralization, rather than promoting it.

Vitalik Buterin highlighted several key initiatives and discussions within the Ethereum research community aimed at ensuring that the network remains decentralized, including:

• In-depth analysis of multi-proposal systems: The team has been exploring the use of multi-proposal systems potential for a more even distribution of proposal power.

• Elimination of builder role: Discussion is ongoing on whether the role of builder can be eliminated to reduce the number of central control points within the network.

• Fork selection optimization: There has been an exchange of ideas on the idea of ​​making fork selection dependent on transaction inclusion, which could help increase the decentralization of the block verification process.

• Orbit Single-Slot Finality (SSF): Research is ongoing into accelerating the deployment of the Orbit mechanism, which aims to significantly reduce the minimum deposit size of validators and achieve single-slot finality, i.e., within the same time slot Proposing and finalizing blocks, this innovation could significantly increase Ethereum’s efficiency and reduce centralization risks.

• PeerDAS’s distributed block construction: The Ethereum team is also exploring PeerDAS’s distributed block construction technology, aiming to distribute control of block construction more broadly.

• Network Analysis and Broadband Optimization: Efforts are being made to optimize the network and bandwidth requirements of PeerDAS and fullDAS to ensure that the network can be expanded without centralized control.

• Recovering from 51% attacks: The team is working on partially automating recovery from 51% attacks to reduce reliance on the social layer to maintain network resilience without centralized oversight.

• Inclusion Lists apply to blobs and transactions: Ensure inclusion lists are fully applicable to blobs and native account abstract transactions, such as the solution proposed in EIP-7560, to maintain transparency and decentralization.

One of the key points of Vitalik Buterin’s rebuttal focused on the concept of single-slot finality (SSF). Currently, Ethereum blocks take about 15 minutes to be finalized, but through SSF, proposals and proposals can be made in the same time slot. Blocks are finalized, significantly reducing finalization time and increasing the overall efficiency of the network.

Overall, SSF is still in the research stage, but its successful implementation is expected to take Ethereum another leap forward, ensuring faster transactions and reducing centralization by minimizing any single entity’s control over block finalization risk.

The above is the detailed content of ETH core developers criticize Ethereum for becoming increasingly centralized! V God proposes 8 major arguments to refute. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!