TL;DR:
- You want to avoid that overridden/mocked properties/methods affect other tests.
- For local objects (created and owned by this test) you can (and should) use
- localObject.theAnswer = 42 and
- localObject.calcTheAnswer = jest.fn(() => 42).
- For global objects you should use
- jest.replaceProperty(globalObject, "theAnswer", 42) and
- jest.spyOn(globalObject, "calcTheAnswer").mockReturnValue(42).
- Make sure jest.restoreAllMocks() is called in an afterEach() hook.
What?
In a perfect world codebase there is no need to manipulate global objects, but the world codebases are messy - and so is testing.
What you want to avoid at all costs, is for one test to affect the other. Tests should be meaningful regardless of their order or if some tests are skipped.
Mocking Properties
A naive approach to mock values is to just set the properties to whatever value you need in your test.
This is fine as long as you change values in local objects owned (created by) this specific test:
describe("override properties of local objects", () => { it("works and is harmless", () => { const myArray = [1]; myArray.length = 0; expect(myArray).toHaveLength(0); }); it("does not affect the next test", () => { const myArray = [1]; expect(myArray).toHaveLength(1); }); });
If you do that for global objects, it gets messy:
describe("don't override properties of global objects", () => { it("works before the property is overridden", () => { expect(window.innerWidth).toBeGreaterThan(0); }); it("works, but is evil", () => { window.innerWidth = 0; expect(window.innerWidth).toBe(0); }); it("fails in the test after the property was overridden", () => { expect(() => { expect(window.innerWidth).toBeGreaterThan(0); // <p>This is what jest.replaceProperty() was made for:<br> </p> <pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">describe("use jest.replaceProperty() to override properties of global objects", () => { afterEach(() => { jest.restoreAllMocks(); }); it("works before the property is overridden", () => { expect(window.innerWidth).toBeGreaterThan(0); }); it("works and is harmless", () => { jest.replaceProperty(window, "innerWidth", 0); expect(window.innerWidth).toBe(0); }); it("does not affect the next test", () => { expect(window.innerWidth).toBeGreaterThan(0); }); });
Mocking Methods
Methods can be mocked similar to properties.
describe("override methods of local objects using jest.fn()", () => { it("works and is harmless", () => { const mySet = new Set([1]); mySet.has = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(false); expect(mySet.has(1)).toBeFalsy(); }); it("does not affect the next test", () => { const mySet = new Set([1]); expect(mySet.has(1)).toBeTruthy(); }); });
If you use myObject.someFunction = jest.fn() on global objects, your tests may depend on each other and loose their meaning:
describe("don't override methods of global objects using jest.fn()", () => { it("works before the method is overridden", () => { expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBeNull(); }); it("works, but is evil", () => { const el = document.createElement("div"); document.getElementById = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(el); expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBe(el); }); it("fails in the test after the property was overridden", () => { expect(() => { expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBeNull(); // <p>How should we mock methods in global objects? That is what jest.spyOn() is good for:<br> </p> <pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">describe("use jest.spyOn() to override methods of global objects", () => { afterEach(() => { jest.restoreAllMocks(); }); it("works before the method is overridden", () => { expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBeNull(); }); it("works and is harmless", () => { const el = document.createElement("div"); jest.spyOn(document, "getElementById").mockReturnValue(el); expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBe(el); }); it("does not affect the next test", () => { expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBeNull(); }); });
You Must Clean up
If you want to be sure all tests find the system in the same (fresh, clean) state, you need to restore the state of mocks after each test.
The simplest solution is to set the restoreMocks configuration property.
The most straight forward option is to call jest.restoreAllMocks() in the afterEach()
How to Mock Something for all Tests
Sometimes you want to Mock things for all tests in a file. If you use jest.spyOn() and jest.replaceProperty() on the top-level or in a describe() block, all Mocks will be reset after the first test is executed.
On the top-level you can safely override properties and methods, without jest.spyOn() and jest.replaceProperty().
If you want to Mock things only for a describe() block, you need to make these calls in a beforeEach() hook.
The above is the detailed content of Jest Recap: Safely Mock Properties and Methods of Global Objects. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

Node.js excels at efficient I/O, largely thanks to streams. Streams process data incrementally, avoiding memory overload—ideal for large files, network tasks, and real-time applications. Combining streams with TypeScript's type safety creates a powe

The differences in performance and efficiency between Python and JavaScript are mainly reflected in: 1) As an interpreted language, Python runs slowly but has high development efficiency and is suitable for rapid prototype development; 2) JavaScript is limited to single thread in the browser, but multi-threading and asynchronous I/O can be used to improve performance in Node.js, and both have advantages in actual projects.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.
