Paradigm researcher: It was caused by pressure from a certain VC! Uniswap profit sharing proposal delayed

Uniswap’s previous UNI profit sharing proposal has been postponed (no deadline yet). UNI has fallen 20% since the 24th. Well-known Paradigm researchers even criticized that the delay was due to the intervention of a VC The purpose of this relationship is to advance other projects they invest in.

Uniswap changes the fee mechanism to benefit UNI holders

Uniswap originally announced on May 25 that it would launch on-chain voting on the 31st to upgrade the protocol so that the fee mechanism can reward pledges and delegations UNI token holders.

Unexpectedly, the Uniswap Foundation stated on June 1 that this proposal had been postponed due to concerns from stakeholders: Last week a stakeholder raised new issues related to this work, and we need to The case is subject to a full review. Due to the immutability and sensitivity of our upgrade proposal, we have made the difficult decision to postpone the vote. This resolution was not anticipated and we apologize for the delay and will keep the community updated on any significant changes once we have more certainty about future timeframes.

The foundation did not disclose the new voting schedule, nor did it mention details about this "new issue."

Uniswap Foundation announces postponement of voting

Paradigm researcher accuses VC of obstructing it

The delay of governance proposals has never been seen in the crypto community Receiving good reviews makes it easier for the community to further speculate whether the governance process has been manipulated.

Dan Robinson, general partner of Paradigm and a well-known researcher, said: It is disappointing to see a large venture capital company trying to persecute the token governance process at the last minute and delay community proposals, just to promote what it likes. project.

Many communities directly speculate whether the VC is a16z? However, previous reports also mentioned that distributing profits to UNI holders may have the most direct impact on liquidity providers (LPs), who are unwilling to distribute profits to UNI holders who do not provide liquidity.

As of now, Uniswap not only needs to further update the content of the proposal, but the lawsuit with the SEC is far from over.

The above is the detailed content of Paradigm researcher: It was caused by pressure from a certain VC! Uniswap profit sharing proposal delayed. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!