British judge rules that Craig Wright's identity as Bitcoin founder was faked

In a written verdict following a failed trial defense earlier this year, the word "forgery" was mentioned 130 times, all in relation to Wright.

A British judge has formally found computer scientist Craig Wright guilty of mass forgery after he suffered a decisive court defeat in March.

In a written decision released on Monday, Superior Court Judge James Mellor noted that Wright "pervasively and repeatedly" lied in court to support his "biggest lie" that he claimed to be Bitcoin's pseudonymous founder Satoshi Nakamoto.

Wright’s forgery is shocking

"Dr. Wright describes himself as a very intelligent man," Mellor wrote. "However, in my opinion, he is not nearly as smart as he thinks he is."

This statement was in addition to Judge Mellor’s assertions about Wright after a six-week trial, in which he immediately declared that Wright was not the founder of Bitcoin. This conclusion was based on the "overwhelming" evidence presented in court against him.

The organization suing Craig Wright is the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), a coalition of leading companies in the encryption industry. COPA's mission is to safeguard the interests of open source developers and promote technology adoption by removing patent barriers. One of the coalition's goals is to end Wright's long-running series of defamation lawsuits against his online critics.

During the trial, the Cryptozoological Open Patent Alliance (COPA) made serious accusations against Craig Wright, claiming that he had committed counterfeiting on an "industrial scale". COPA showed some documents that Wright had previously used as evidence to support his claim that he was the author of the Bitcoin white paper. However, the documents were revealed to be forgeries, dealing a blow to Wright's credibility and claims.

During the trial, Wright disputed the testimony of all expert witnesses, including those retained by his own legal team, who gave evidence showing evidence of document forgery. The rebuttal showed that Wright was questioning the expert testimony and the evidence they presented and was trying to defend himself in court.

Riddled with lies, forgeries and technical jargon

During cross-examination in court, Craig Wright failed to provide any information about the recipient of Bitcoin sent as "Satoshi Nakamoto" that would have strengthened his claim to be the founder of Bitcoin. As one of his personal witnesses, Wright's sister provided testimony. She expressed her belief that Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto. The reason was Wright's love of karate when he was a child and his preference for Japanese names.

However, Judge Mellor pointed out that the evidence she presented did not provide any credible support for Wright’s claim that he claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, nor did she confirm that Wright had shared a pre-release version of the Bitcoin white paper with her. "

In the judge's detailed judgment, which was highly critical of Craig Wright's conduct, the word "forgery" was repeated 130 times, "lie" was mentioned 123 times, and "fraud" appeared 19 times. Second-rate. These frequently used words reflect the judge's view of Wright's behavior in the courtroom.

When faced with being exposed as a lie, Judge Mellor observed that Wright tended to deflect blame or respond by resorting to incomprehensible "technical jargon," suggesting that in the judge's view, Wright's performance in court failed to provide A reasonable and convincing explanation to counter the evidence against him.

In his judgment, Justice Mellor expressed his view that Wright resorted to technical terms because he was unable to provide a logically coherent explanation for the forgery that had been revealed. Mellor further noted that Wright also failed to admit responsibility for the forgeries. This reflects the judge's assessment of Wright's defense strategy in court, as well as questions about Wright's personal integrity.

Craig Wright issued a statement via Twitter on Monday saying he planned to appeal the court's ruling on his status. At the same time, he also expressed his gratitude to all supporters for their continued encouragement and support. This statement shows that despite facing adverse court rulings, Wright still has the support of some people and that he intends to continue to fight for the legitimacy of his position.

Conclusion:

With the release of Judge James Mellor's verdict in the case of Craig Wright, the computer scientist who claims to be the founder of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, is facing a major setback in his career. Judge Mellor's judgment is full of doubts about Wright's integrity. The frequent occurrence of words such as "forgery", "lie" and "fraud" highlights the court's distrust of the evidence provided by Wright.

At the same time, although Wright expressed his intention to appeal through social media and expressed his gratitude to his supporters, his road ahead is still full of challenges.

Ultimately, this case not only has profound personal consequences for Wright, but also raises important questions about trust, identity, and intellectual property for the entire cryptocurrency community. As legal proceedings continue, the world will be watching closely to see how the legal battle over the identity of Bitcoin's mysterious founder unfolds.

The above is the detailed content of British judge rules that Craig Wright's identity as Bitcoin founder was faked. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!