Comparison of concurrent programming in C++ and Python

Both C and Python support concurrent programming. C uses threads and Python uses coroutines. C threads are more lightweight and Python coroutines are easier to use. In actual combat, C concurrent web server performs better than Python under high load, but Python is easier to develop and maintain under low load. The final choice depends on the needs of the specific application.

Concurrent Programming: C vs. Python

Concurrent programming is a technique for performing multiple tasks simultaneously, which allows Multiple processors or threads handle different tasks simultaneously, thereby improving application performance. C and Python are two popular programming languages, both of which support concurrent programming.

Concurrent Programming in C

C uses threads to implement concurrent programming. Threads are lightweight code execution units, unlike processes, which are heavy-duty units scheduled by the operating system. In C, you can use the std::thread class to create threads. The following code creates a simple thread in C:

#include <iostream>
#include <thread>

void print_hello() {
  std::cout << "Hello, world!" << std::endl;
}

int main() {
  std::thread t(print_hello);
  t.join();
  return 0;
}

Concurrent Programming in Python

Python uses coroutines to implement concurrent programming. Coroutines are similar to threads, but they are more lightweight and have lower overhead. Coroutines can be implemented in Python using the async and await keywords. The following code creates a simple coroutine in Python:

import asyncio

async def print_hello():
  print("Hello, world!")

async def main():
  await print_hello()

asyncio.run(main())

Practical case: Concurrent Web server

In order to compare the performance of C and Python in concurrent programming, We can create a concurrent web server. The following code is a simple concurrent web server, implemented in C:

#include <iostream>
#include <boost/asio.hpp>

int main() {
  boost::asio::io_service io_service;
  boost::asio::ip::tcp::acceptor acceptor(io_service, boost::asio::ip::tcp::endpoint(boost::asio::ip::tcp::v4(), 8080));

  for (;;) {
    boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket socket(io_service);
    acceptor.accept(socket);
    std::thread t([&socket] {
      std::string request;
      socket.read_some(boost::asio::buffer(request));
      std::string response = "HTTP/1.1 200 OK\nContent-Type: text/plain\n\nHello, world!";
      socket.write_some(boost::asio::buffer(response));
      socket.close();
    });
    t.detach();
  }

  return 0;
}

The following code is a simple concurrent web server, implemented in Python:

import asyncio
import socket

async def handle_client(reader, writer):
  request = await reader.read(1024)
  response = "HTTP/1.1 200 OK\nContent-Type: text/plain\n\nHello, world!"
  writer.write(response.encode())
  await writer.drain()

async def main():
  server = await asyncio.start_server(handle_client, '127.0.0.1', 8080)
  await server.serve_forever()

asyncio.run(main())

Under high load, C Web servers generally perform better than Python web servers because threads have lower overhead than coroutines. However, for low load scenarios, a Python web server may be more suitable as it is easier to develop and maintain.

Conclusion

Both C and Python provide tools for concurrent programming, and each language has its advantages and disadvantages. C's threads are more lightweight, but Python's coroutines are easier to use. Ultimately, which language to choose depends on the needs of your specific application.

The above is the detailed content of Comparison of concurrent programming in C++ and Python. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!